Skip to main content

The BUSKLAW September Newsletter: The Two Essential Questions to Include in Your RFP


Does your company use RFPs (Requests for Proposal) in finding vendors for information technology products? RFPs are an essential part of the technology acquisition process. Some companies provide their RFP - and the vendor's response to it - to their attorney tasked to legally document the deal only after the vendor is informally awarded the project. The company attorney may not even be a part of the RFP process.  This practice is unwise. To be effective, your company's IT business team should work closely with your attorney to create a comprehensive RFP designed to obtain detailed information - not only about the prospective vendor's solution, but also about the vendor itself.  

In my experience, every RFP should contain the following two questions for the vendor:

1.Have any of your customers or former customers terminated a contract before the engagement was completed? If yes, please explain and specify the contact names and phone numbers of these customers. 

2. Please provide detailed information if you have been assessed any damages in excess of USD $50,000, including liquidated damages, under any of your existing or past contracts with any organization (including any governmental entity, EEOC or antitrust investigations, or workers' compensation). If so, please provide complete details, including the other organization's name, the reason for the damages, and the amount of damages assessed against you for each incident. 


3. As used in the above sections, "you" or "your" means your company responding to this RFP, any member of your senior management team, your company's affiliate, and your company's predecessor. (Note that these definitions may instead be included in a "Definitions" section of the RFP.)


In addition to these key questions, you should also order a Dun & Bradstreet Report on the RFP recipient and ask for bank references. For major projects, you should also consider obtaining the vendor's current balance sheet and a profit and loss statement certified as true (according to GAAP) by the vendor's independent auditor. 

How would I advise the RFP recipient to respond to these questions? For #1, I might say something like (if true):

We pride ourselves on having a high degree of customer satisfaction. In the course of our XX years in business, we've had a handful of customers who terminated their contracts with us before project completion, but these terminations were for business reasons and never resulted in any legal proceedings. 


For #2, I suggest (based on H. Ward Classen's excellent A Practical Guide to Software Licensing (5th Ed., ABA Publishing, 2013) if true:

As with any large corporation, we have during the course of our XX years in business found ourselves involved in claims for damages. But we've had an excellent record of minimizing disputes in customer relationships (that now involve many contractual commitments), with governmental regulatory agencies, with our employees, and concerning state insurance obligations. Where disputes have occurred, nearly all were resolved without resort to litigation or arbitration. Few ever progressed to protracted litigation, and even those which did were ultimately settled without the need for any court ruling. We're proud of this record. And we aren't aware of any assessments that would have a material impact on us providing services to you. 

If the customer presses for details of these disputes, I'd simply tell it that the vendor can't disclose anything because of non-disclosure requirements, a statement that is probably always true. 

These questions - and their answers - should be an essential part of any RFP and the vendor's response. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The BUSKLAW June Newsletter: Forcing Business Behavior Changes Through Buried Contract Provisions: Salesforce and Camping World

As reported by  The Washington Post , business-software giant Salesforce  recently instituted a policy barring its retailer customers from using its technology to sell semi-automatic weapons, including the AR-15 used in numerous mass shootings. One such customer is  Camping World , whose Gander Outdoors division sells many "AR" and other semi-automatic rifles .  Rather than approach Camping World/Gander, a "leading" Salesforce customer, and negotiating the termination of their semi-automatic rifle sales in exchange for some benefit (such as a software discount), Salesforce was tricky. They buried a provision barring the sale of semi-automatic rifles in the acceptable-use policy  ("AUP") binding on Camping World/Gander: Salesforce wants to force Camping World/Gander to make a major change to its business model via an addition to their AUP that is irrelevant to their customer's licensed use of Salesforce software. And although sneaky, I bet tha

The BUSKLAW Halloween 2022 Post: Stephen King's Asides on Poor Writing in Fairy Tale

  Having just read  Stephen King's Fairy Tale in time for Halloween, it's appropriate to examine his asides on poor writing included in the book. (BTW, Fairy Tale is a good read with King's typical well-executed character development, plot, and a great finish to the story. But you have like the whole Grimm fairy tale genre before you read his take on it.)  Stephen King doesn't tolerate anything less than crisp prose. When the story's hero, Charlie Reade, tries to read a book about the origins of fantasy and its place in the world matrix ("what a mouthful"), he can only scan it because: It was everything I hated about what I thought of as "hoity-toity" academic writing, full of five-dollar words and tortured syntax. Maybe that's intellectual laziness on my part, but maybe not. Later on, Charlie tries to focus on a particular chapter in the "origins of fantasy" book about the story of Jack and the Beanstalk but is put off by "t

The BUSKLAW April Newsletter: A Force Majeure Clause for the New Millennium

(Author’s Note: I originally wrote this post for Y2K, but I’ve updated it using plain English.  Happy April Fool’s Day 2016!)             A standard force majeure contract clause, where "Acts of God" excuse one party from performing their obligations without that non-performance being a breach of contract, are so 20th Century. So what if fire, flood, hurricane, snowstorm, or riot excuse contractual non-performance. Those events are too mundane to contemplate! Contract lawyers desperately need a force majeure clause for the clear and present dangers of the new(er) millennium! So, as a public service to the legal profession, I’ve assumed the heavy burden of drafting a "new age" force majeure clause for my colleagues to freely use: Either party's non-performance of this agreement will be excused to the extent that it is caused by the occurrence of any of the following events or circumstances: (i) Alien abduction, alien invasion, alien cerebral possession,