Skip to main content

The BUSKLAW September Newsletter: The Two Essential Questions to Include in Your RFP


Does your company use RFPs (Requests for Proposal) in finding vendors for information technology products? RFPs are an essential part of the technology acquisition process. Some companies provide their RFP - and the vendor's response to it - to their attorney tasked to legally document the deal only after the vendor is informally awarded the project. The company attorney may not even be a part of the RFP process.  This practice is unwise. To be effective, your company's IT business team should work closely with your attorney to create a comprehensive RFP designed to obtain detailed information - not only about the prospective vendor's solution, but also about the vendor itself.  

In my experience, every RFP should contain the following two questions for the vendor:

1.Have any of your customers or former customers terminated a contract before the engagement was completed? If yes, please explain and specify the contact names and phone numbers of these customers. 

2. Please provide detailed information if you have been assessed any damages in excess of USD $50,000, including liquidated damages, under any of your existing or past contracts with any organization (including any governmental entity, EEOC or antitrust investigations, or workers' compensation). If so, please provide complete details, including the other organization's name, the reason for the damages, and the amount of damages assessed against you for each incident. 


3. As used in the above sections, "you" or "your" means your company responding to this RFP, any member of your senior management team, your company's affiliate, and your company's predecessor. (Note that these definitions may instead be included in a "Definitions" section of the RFP.)


In addition to these key questions, you should also order a Dun & Bradstreet Report on the RFP recipient and ask for bank references. For major projects, you should also consider obtaining the vendor's current balance sheet and a profit and loss statement certified as true (according to GAAP) by the vendor's independent auditor. 

How would I advise the RFP recipient to respond to these questions? For #1, I might say something like (if true):

We pride ourselves on having a high degree of customer satisfaction. In the course of our XX years in business, we've had a handful of customers who terminated their contracts with us before project completion, but these terminations were for business reasons and never resulted in any legal proceedings. 


For #2, I suggest (based on H. Ward Classen's excellent A Practical Guide to Software Licensing (5th Ed., ABA Publishing, 2013) if true:

As with any large corporation, we have during the course of our XX years in business found ourselves involved in claims for damages. But we've had an excellent record of minimizing disputes in customer relationships (that now involve many contractual commitments), with governmental regulatory agencies, with our employees, and concerning state insurance obligations. Where disputes have occurred, nearly all were resolved without resort to litigation or arbitration. Few ever progressed to protracted litigation, and even those which did were ultimately settled without the need for any court ruling. We're proud of this record. And we aren't aware of any assessments that would have a material impact on us providing services to you. 

If the customer presses for details of these disputes, I'd simply tell it that the vendor can't disclose anything because of non-disclosure requirements, a statement that is probably always true. 

These questions - and their answers - should be an essential part of any RFP and the vendor's response. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The BUSKLAW May Newsletter: The Foolhardy Practice of Using Faux Terms of Art in Your Contracts

  Most lawyers draft contracts. That's what lawyers do. And they use perceived terms of art ("TOAs") because they want to be paragons of contract-drafting precision. But here is where the canker gnaws:  the words that lawyers insert in their contracts as TOAs are actually not, potentially causing problems in clarity and interpretation. And as I've said time and again, these problems lead to disputes, and disputes lead to litigation, which is always time-consuming and expensive for the parties involved.  Let's first define TOAs in the legal context. According to Professor Bryan Garner in his Dictionary of Legal Usage , TOAs have specific, precise meanings that are "locked tight" and based on legal precedent. But then there are the faux TOAs, "whose meanings are often unhinged." Expert contract drafters, Garner says, know that clear, simple drafting is less subject to misinterpretation than using TOAs that are nothing more than "mere jargon....

The BUSKLAW 2021 Year in Review - Brit English Sums It Up!

  I'm at a loss to describe 2021 using American English, sorry. AmE has grown tiresome. Don't believe me? Just turn on your local TV news and listen for how many times the news people use "prior" instead of "before" and pepper their speech with "as well," frequently tacking it on after using "also" in the same sentence, as in "It will also rain tomorrow as well." How can all be WELL when every other sentence ends with AS WELL? Warning: don't play a drinking game to count the number of  AS WELLs or you'll be pished (as they say in Scotland) in 10 minutes. Which reminds me of why we should be thankful for Brit English to describe 2021: it was another year that we good guys got knackered .   Consider: Covid continues unabated - now improved with variants (get your booster, wear a mask)! The peaceful transition of the U.S. government after the 2020 presidential election almost didn't happen (can you say "insurrectio...

The BUSKLAW Halloween 2022 Post: Stephen King's Asides on Poor Writing in Fairy Tale

  Having just read  Stephen King's Fairy Tale in time for Halloween, it's appropriate to examine his asides on poor writing included in the book. (BTW, Fairy Tale is a good read with King's typical well-executed character development, plot, and a great finish to the story. But you have like the whole Grimm fairy tale genre before you read his take on it.)  Stephen King doesn't tolerate anything less than crisp prose. When the story's hero, Charlie Reade, tries to read a book about the origins of fantasy and its place in the world matrix ("what a mouthful"), he can only scan it because: It was everything I hated about what I thought of as "hoity-toity" academic writing, full of five-dollar words and tortured syntax. Maybe that's intellectual laziness on my part, but maybe not. Later on, Charlie tries to focus on a particular chapter in the "origins of fantasy" book about the story of Jack and the Beanstalk but is put off by "t...