Skip to main content

The BUSKLAW November Newsletter: The Perils of DIY Contract Drafting


Do you need a contract for your business? What if you don't have a lawyer to call for that? Do you jump on the Web, go to the first DIY legal site that Google brings up, select a form that sounds right, download it for a fee, fill in the blanks, and hope for the best? Or do you find an old contract that your lawyer drafted for a similar deal and just change the parties' names, the date, the business information, and send it to the other side for signature? 

Congratulations! You went the "instantly create a contract" route! Who needs a lawyer when you already have a contract form that seems OK? You saved your company money that can now be put into the office Christmas party fund. You aren't even a lawyer, but you're a smart cookie - C Suite material for certain. So don't be afraid to shop for an expensive toy - like that Tesla Model X with the handy bio-weapon defense mode.

But don't sign that check to Tesla just yet. Instead, make sure that you have your resume up to date and a personal cash reserve, because your decision to use the cookie-cutter approach to contract drafting could cause a world of hurt.

It's never a good idea to pick a form contract that may have worked for one transaction and use it for another without an attorney's careful review (and likely revision) of the contract for the new deal. Even if the business framework is similar for both transactions, there can be subtle (or not so subtle) legal or business differences that call for revisions to the contract. For example:

  • There have been court decisions or changes in federal, state, or local laws or regulations since the first contract was signed that require changes in the contract for the new deal. 
  • The other side in the first contract was a Michigan resident, but the other side in the new contract is located in another state or country.
  • The other side in the first contract was a large, established company, but this customer is a newbie. 
  • The cost of the new deal is greater (or smaller) than the first one.
  • The subject matter of the transaction is different. For example, the first deal was for goods; this new deal is for services.
Even Donald Trump's lawyers (who should know better) can screw things up by using a contract from a previous transaction.

And an area with great potential for cookie-cutter contract mischief is the misuse of non-disclosure agreements, including selecting a form that protects only one side's confidential information. That's what happened to the plaintiff in the case of Fail-Safe, LLC v. A.O. Smith Corp., 674 F.3d 889, 893-94 (7th Cir. 2012) (affirming summary judgment for defendant): The plaintiff's confidentiality agreement with the defendant protected only the defendant's information; consequently, the plaintiff's afterthought disclosures of its own confidential information were unprotected. (Thanks to Professor D.C. Toedt III for bringing this to my attention.)

You may be handy enough to assemble a wine rack (I did this once and barely lived to tell the tale, as my Meijer coffee-break pals may recall) or even remodel your bathroom. But don't be fooled by thinking that you can safely re-purpose your contracts or grab a form contract from the Web that seems right without consulting an experienced lawyer. Trouble awaits those looking for a quick contractual fix! 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The BUSKLAW June Newsletter: Forcing Business Behavior Changes Through Buried Contract Provisions: Salesforce and Camping World

As reported by  The Washington Post , business-software giant Salesforce  recently instituted a policy barring its retailer customers from using its technology to sell semi-automatic weapons, including the AR-15 used in numerous mass shootings. One such customer is  Camping World , whose Gander Outdoors division sells many "AR" and other semi-automatic rifles .  Rather than approach Camping World/Gander, a "leading" Salesforce customer, and negotiating the termination of their semi-automatic rifle sales in exchange for some benefit (such as a software discount), Salesforce was tricky. They buried a provision barring the sale of semi-automatic rifles in the acceptable-use policy  ("AUP") binding on Camping World/Gander: Salesforce wants to force Camping World/Gander to make a major change to its business model via an addition to their AUP that is irrelevant to their customer's licensed use of Salesforce software. And although sneaky, I bet tha

The BUSKLAW Halloween 2022 Post: Stephen King's Asides on Poor Writing in Fairy Tale

  Having just read  Stephen King's Fairy Tale in time for Halloween, it's appropriate to examine his asides on poor writing included in the book. (BTW, Fairy Tale is a good read with King's typical well-executed character development, plot, and a great finish to the story. But you have like the whole Grimm fairy tale genre before you read his take on it.)  Stephen King doesn't tolerate anything less than crisp prose. When the story's hero, Charlie Reade, tries to read a book about the origins of fantasy and its place in the world matrix ("what a mouthful"), he can only scan it because: It was everything I hated about what I thought of as "hoity-toity" academic writing, full of five-dollar words and tortured syntax. Maybe that's intellectual laziness on my part, but maybe not. Later on, Charlie tries to focus on a particular chapter in the "origins of fantasy" book about the story of Jack and the Beanstalk but is put off by "t

The BUSKLAW April Newsletter: A Force Majeure Clause for the New Millennium

(Author’s Note: I originally wrote this post for Y2K, but I’ve updated it using plain English.  Happy April Fool’s Day 2016!)             A standard force majeure contract clause, where "Acts of God" excuse one party from performing their obligations without that non-performance being a breach of contract, are so 20th Century. So what if fire, flood, hurricane, snowstorm, or riot excuse contractual non-performance. Those events are too mundane to contemplate! Contract lawyers desperately need a force majeure clause for the clear and present dangers of the new(er) millennium! So, as a public service to the legal profession, I’ve assumed the heavy burden of drafting a "new age" force majeure clause for my colleagues to freely use: Either party's non-performance of this agreement will be excused to the extent that it is caused by the occurrence of any of the following events or circumstances: (i) Alien abduction, alien invasion, alien cerebral possession,