Skip to main content

March 2015 BUSKLAW Newsletter: Focus on Non-Disclosure Agreements ("NDAs")



________________________________

Fact: business folks love NDAs. Before a deal is ever discussed, the vendor or its customer will usually insist on signing a NDA. The typical NDA is usually written to cover any information disclosed between the parties in whatever form. It may cover one party's "confidential" information disclosed to the other (a unilateral NDA) or cover each party's "confidential" information disclosed to the other (a reciprocal NDA). "Confidential" information is usually broadly defined to include anything that isn't public knowledge that was disclosed by each party to other. The NDA may require that the data disclosed be marked CONFIDENTIAL for it to be covered by the NDA. 

The medical profession has been criticized for prescribing antibiotics needlessly, and lawyers should be criticized for the needless preparation of NDAs. Like the overuse of antibiotics, the overuse of NDAs has the same result: the effectiveness of the tool is reduced in situations where its use makes good sense.

As a seller of anything, I have an inherent interest in limiting competition. The more I can do to narrow a prospective buyer’s alternatives to my product  the better. And once I start selling to the buyer, the more I can do to prolong the relationship the better. A good way to do this is to prevent the buyer from shopping the competition. What better way to do that than insisting that my buyer sign a NDA that prevents disclosure of our business relationship? Having a NDA in force indefinitely will dissuade my buyer from looking for better deals on similar products from my competitors.


So, I as a savvy seller will send my buyer our company’s form NDA. I will tell the buyer that we have all of our customers routinely sign this agreement and that no one ever changes it. Don’t even bother to read it. If you do, don’t be concerned about the fact that you are agreeing to protect our “ideas, concepts, plans, and methods” even though these do not qualify as trade secrets. And don’t worry about the fact that you must protect all information that we give you even if it isn’t marked “confidential.”


The buyer may point out that the length of its non-disclosure obligations in the agreement is not specifically defined, only that the NDA states that either party may terminate the agreement at any time on advance notice.  But the extent to which the buyer must protect the seller's confidential information after termination may not be specified, only that this obligation “survives” the agreement’s termination. The seller may think that its confidential information is so valuable that the buyer must protect it forever!

On the buyer side, it may intend to disclose sensitive business information to the seller about the buyer's information technology infrastructure, customer-base, or future business plans to determine if the seller's product would meet the buyer's expectations for a good return on investment. So, the NDA may require the seller to keep secret everything that buyer discloses to it related to the proposed transaction. But is this fair to the seller?


NDAs have their proper place between buyers and sellers if the following guidelines are followed:

  • The confidential information to be protected is clearly and concisely defined. To do this, the business folks should prepare an Exhibit A to the NDA that describes the parties' confidential information in reasonable detail. 
  • The duration of the protection is limited to a reasonable time. For technology transactions, five years is usually fair. After that period, the business landscape will probably have changed so much that there is no reason to further protect the confidential information.
  •  If the parties proceed with the proposed deal and sign a purchase agreement or software license, there should be confidentiality provisions in that agreement (lawyers may call this a "definitive agreement") that should apply to information disclosed between the parties after the effective date of the definitive agreement. The NDA should apply only to confidential information disclosed before the definitive agreement is signed.
  • Avoid the situation where, instead of a reciprocal NDA, each party just signs the other's unilateral NDA. This is always a bad idea because the two agreements are likely to conflict with each other. 
  • Each party should track the NDAs they have signed, their duration, and expiration dates. It's common for an NDA to expire "X" years from the signature date, but the confidential information must be protected for "X" years after the NDA's expiration. If you don't understand when your confidentiality obligations expire, find an attorney who can read the agreement and advise you about that. 
  • Create a spreadsheet of all NDAs, keep it current, and send the link to all company personnel who may have occasion to confer with the other party to the NDA - or their competitor. This should help prevent your company's unintentional breach of the NDA by disclosing the other party's confidential information to their competitor.
  • Even with a NDA in place, be cautious of what you disclose to the other party. You should investigate the other party to determine if it has a good business reputation. Ask for credit references and a list of the party's customers and contact them to see if they have had any problems with that party. 
NDAs are valuable when properly and selectively used. Don't let the litigators in my profession become even more wealthy by filing suit against the parties "guilty" of NDA overuse! 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The BUSKLAW June Newsletter: Forcing Business Behavior Changes Through Buried Contract Provisions: Salesforce and Camping World

As reported by  The Washington Post , business-software giant Salesforce  recently instituted a policy barring its retailer customers from using its technology to sell semi-automatic weapons, including the AR-15 used in numerous mass shootings. One such customer is  Camping World , whose Gander Outdoors division sells many "AR" and other semi-automatic rifles .  Rather than approach Camping World/Gander, a "leading" Salesforce customer, and negotiating the termination of their semi-automatic rifle sales in exchange for some benefit (such as a software discount), Salesforce was tricky. They buried a provision barring the sale of semi-automatic rifles in the acceptable-use policy  ("AUP") binding on Camping World/Gander: Salesforce wants to force Camping World/Gander to make a major change to its business model via an addition to their AUP that is irrelevant to their customer's licensed use of Salesforce software. And although sneaky, I bet tha

The BUSKLAW Halloween 2022 Post: Stephen King's Asides on Poor Writing in Fairy Tale

  Having just read  Stephen King's Fairy Tale in time for Halloween, it's appropriate to examine his asides on poor writing included in the book. (BTW, Fairy Tale is a good read with King's typical well-executed character development, plot, and a great finish to the story. But you have like the whole Grimm fairy tale genre before you read his take on it.)  Stephen King doesn't tolerate anything less than crisp prose. When the story's hero, Charlie Reade, tries to read a book about the origins of fantasy and its place in the world matrix ("what a mouthful"), he can only scan it because: It was everything I hated about what I thought of as "hoity-toity" academic writing, full of five-dollar words and tortured syntax. Maybe that's intellectual laziness on my part, but maybe not. Later on, Charlie tries to focus on a particular chapter in the "origins of fantasy" book about the story of Jack and the Beanstalk but is put off by "t

The BUSKLAW April Newsletter: A Force Majeure Clause for the New Millennium

(Author’s Note: I originally wrote this post for Y2K, but I’ve updated it using plain English.  Happy April Fool’s Day 2016!)             A standard force majeure contract clause, where "Acts of God" excuse one party from performing their obligations without that non-performance being a breach of contract, are so 20th Century. So what if fire, flood, hurricane, snowstorm, or riot excuse contractual non-performance. Those events are too mundane to contemplate! Contract lawyers desperately need a force majeure clause for the clear and present dangers of the new(er) millennium! So, as a public service to the legal profession, I’ve assumed the heavy burden of drafting a "new age" force majeure clause for my colleagues to freely use: Either party's non-performance of this agreement will be excused to the extent that it is caused by the occurrence of any of the following events or circumstances: (i) Alien abduction, alien invasion, alien cerebral possession,