Skip to main content

March 2015 BUSKLAW Newsletter: Focus on Non-Disclosure Agreements ("NDAs")



________________________________

Fact: business folks love NDAs. Before a deal is ever discussed, the vendor or its customer will usually insist on signing a NDA. The typical NDA is usually written to cover any information disclosed between the parties in whatever form. It may cover one party's "confidential" information disclosed to the other (a unilateral NDA) or cover each party's "confidential" information disclosed to the other (a reciprocal NDA). "Confidential" information is usually broadly defined to include anything that isn't public knowledge that was disclosed by each party to other. The NDA may require that the data disclosed be marked CONFIDENTIAL for it to be covered by the NDA. 

The medical profession has been criticized for prescribing antibiotics needlessly, and lawyers should be criticized for the needless preparation of NDAs. Like the overuse of antibiotics, the overuse of NDAs has the same result: the effectiveness of the tool is reduced in situations where its use makes good sense.

As a seller of anything, I have an inherent interest in limiting competition. The more I can do to narrow a prospective buyer’s alternatives to my product  the better. And once I start selling to the buyer, the more I can do to prolong the relationship the better. A good way to do this is to prevent the buyer from shopping the competition. What better way to do that than insisting that my buyer sign a NDA that prevents disclosure of our business relationship? Having a NDA in force indefinitely will dissuade my buyer from looking for better deals on similar products from my competitors.


So, I as a savvy seller will send my buyer our company’s form NDA. I will tell the buyer that we have all of our customers routinely sign this agreement and that no one ever changes it. Don’t even bother to read it. If you do, don’t be concerned about the fact that you are agreeing to protect our “ideas, concepts, plans, and methods” even though these do not qualify as trade secrets. And don’t worry about the fact that you must protect all information that we give you even if it isn’t marked “confidential.”


The buyer may point out that the length of its non-disclosure obligations in the agreement is not specifically defined, only that the NDA states that either party may terminate the agreement at any time on advance notice.  But the extent to which the buyer must protect the seller's confidential information after termination may not be specified, only that this obligation “survives” the agreement’s termination. The seller may think that its confidential information is so valuable that the buyer must protect it forever!

On the buyer side, it may intend to disclose sensitive business information to the seller about the buyer's information technology infrastructure, customer-base, or future business plans to determine if the seller's product would meet the buyer's expectations for a good return on investment. So, the NDA may require the seller to keep secret everything that buyer discloses to it related to the proposed transaction. But is this fair to the seller?


NDAs have their proper place between buyers and sellers if the following guidelines are followed:

  • The confidential information to be protected is clearly and concisely defined. To do this, the business folks should prepare an Exhibit A to the NDA that describes the parties' confidential information in reasonable detail. 
  • The duration of the protection is limited to a reasonable time. For technology transactions, five years is usually fair. After that period, the business landscape will probably have changed so much that there is no reason to further protect the confidential information.
  •  If the parties proceed with the proposed deal and sign a purchase agreement or software license, there should be confidentiality provisions in that agreement (lawyers may call this a "definitive agreement") that should apply to information disclosed between the parties after the effective date of the definitive agreement. The NDA should apply only to confidential information disclosed before the definitive agreement is signed.
  • Avoid the situation where, instead of a reciprocal NDA, each party just signs the other's unilateral NDA. This is always a bad idea because the two agreements are likely to conflict with each other. 
  • Each party should track the NDAs they have signed, their duration, and expiration dates. It's common for an NDA to expire "X" years from the signature date, but the confidential information must be protected for "X" years after the NDA's expiration. If you don't understand when your confidentiality obligations expire, find an attorney who can read the agreement and advise you about that. 
  • Create a spreadsheet of all NDAs, keep it current, and send the link to all company personnel who may have occasion to confer with the other party to the NDA - or their competitor. This should help prevent your company's unintentional breach of the NDA by disclosing the other party's confidential information to their competitor.
  • Even with a NDA in place, be cautious of what you disclose to the other party. You should investigate the other party to determine if it has a good business reputation. Ask for credit references and a list of the party's customers and contact them to see if they have had any problems with that party. 
NDAs are valuable when properly and selectively used. Don't let the litigators in my profession become even more wealthy by filing suit against the parties "guilty" of NDA overuse! 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The BUSKLAW April Newsletter: On the Foolish Tension Between Lawyers and Business Folks

From my colleague Mark Grossman   comes this joke (just in time for April Fool's Day): A man in a hot air balloon is lost. He reduces the balloon's height and spots a man below. He shouts, "Excuse me, can you tell me where I am?" The man below says: "Yes, you're in a hot air balloon hovering at 30 feet." " You must be a lawyer," says the balloonist. "I am," replies the man. "How did you know?" "Well," says the balloonist, "everything you have told me is technically correct, but useless." The man below says, "You must work in business." "I do," replies the balloonist, "but how did you know?" "Well," says the lawyer, "you don't know where you are, or where you're going, but you expect me to be able to help. You're in the same position you were before we met, but now it's my fault." ______________________________________...

The BUSKLAW November Newsletter: About the U.S. Army's Extraterrestrial Technology Acquisition Contract!

This post would appear to be a Halloween prank, but it isn't. On October 10, 2019, the U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command signed a contract [or in government parlance, a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA)] with To the Stars Academy of Arts and Science, Inc. for the acquisition of the latter's ET(?) technology. The entire contract is available here , but I'll save you from the content that isn't worth your time.   But first some history. Once there was a punk rock group called Blink 182 , founded by Tom DeLonge. Tom eventually became more enthused about UFOs than rock music and decided to seriously study unexplained aerial phenomena (UAP). He claims to have formed relationships with top government officials to eventually disclose to the public what's behind UAP. In the meantime, Tom formed a public corporation, To the Stars Academy (TSA), to be a "revolutionary collaboration between academia, industry and pop culture to a...

The BUSKLAW January Newsletter: Catching Typographical Errors in Contracts

“Career Path” is an overused term to describe how we should conduct our professional lives to reach our full potential. In my experience, most self-help books on this subject assume that we have more control over our lives than we actually do. The old adage, “Man proposes, God disposes,” is not evident in these books. And yet there are ways for contracts lawyers to reach their full potential - how about by catching those pesky typographical errors ("typos")?  Is there anything more rewarding to a contracts lawyer than catching a typographical error? Of course not. I once did a long and complicated real estate license agreement, only to have my client point out the fact that on page 39, section 1, paragraph A, subsection (i), clause (z) of the contract I drafted, the word “thee” should be “the.” I can’t tell you enough about the warm fuzzy feeling that this observation created in the depths of my soul!  At best, typographical errors are embarrassing and have only...