Skip to main content

March 2015 BUSKLAW Newsletter: Focus on Non-Disclosure Agreements ("NDAs")



________________________________

Fact: business folks love NDAs. Before a deal is ever discussed, the vendor or its customer will usually insist on signing a NDA. The typical NDA is usually written to cover any information disclosed between the parties in whatever form. It may cover one party's "confidential" information disclosed to the other (a unilateral NDA) or cover each party's "confidential" information disclosed to the other (a reciprocal NDA). "Confidential" information is usually broadly defined to include anything that isn't public knowledge that was disclosed by each party to other. The NDA may require that the data disclosed be marked CONFIDENTIAL for it to be covered by the NDA. 

The medical profession has been criticized for prescribing antibiotics needlessly, and lawyers should be criticized for the needless preparation of NDAs. Like the overuse of antibiotics, the overuse of NDAs has the same result: the effectiveness of the tool is reduced in situations where its use makes good sense.

As a seller of anything, I have an inherent interest in limiting competition. The more I can do to narrow a prospective buyer’s alternatives to my product  the better. And once I start selling to the buyer, the more I can do to prolong the relationship the better. A good way to do this is to prevent the buyer from shopping the competition. What better way to do that than insisting that my buyer sign a NDA that prevents disclosure of our business relationship? Having a NDA in force indefinitely will dissuade my buyer from looking for better deals on similar products from my competitors.


So, I as a savvy seller will send my buyer our company’s form NDA. I will tell the buyer that we have all of our customers routinely sign this agreement and that no one ever changes it. Don’t even bother to read it. If you do, don’t be concerned about the fact that you are agreeing to protect our “ideas, concepts, plans, and methods” even though these do not qualify as trade secrets. And don’t worry about the fact that you must protect all information that we give you even if it isn’t marked “confidential.”


The buyer may point out that the length of its non-disclosure obligations in the agreement is not specifically defined, only that the NDA states that either party may terminate the agreement at any time on advance notice.  But the extent to which the buyer must protect the seller's confidential information after termination may not be specified, only that this obligation “survives” the agreement’s termination. The seller may think that its confidential information is so valuable that the buyer must protect it forever!

On the buyer side, it may intend to disclose sensitive business information to the seller about the buyer's information technology infrastructure, customer-base, or future business plans to determine if the seller's product would meet the buyer's expectations for a good return on investment. So, the NDA may require the seller to keep secret everything that buyer discloses to it related to the proposed transaction. But is this fair to the seller?


NDAs have their proper place between buyers and sellers if the following guidelines are followed:

  • The confidential information to be protected is clearly and concisely defined. To do this, the business folks should prepare an Exhibit A to the NDA that describes the parties' confidential information in reasonable detail. 
  • The duration of the protection is limited to a reasonable time. For technology transactions, five years is usually fair. After that period, the business landscape will probably have changed so much that there is no reason to further protect the confidential information.
  •  If the parties proceed with the proposed deal and sign a purchase agreement or software license, there should be confidentiality provisions in that agreement (lawyers may call this a "definitive agreement") that should apply to information disclosed between the parties after the effective date of the definitive agreement. The NDA should apply only to confidential information disclosed before the definitive agreement is signed.
  • Avoid the situation where, instead of a reciprocal NDA, each party just signs the other's unilateral NDA. This is always a bad idea because the two agreements are likely to conflict with each other. 
  • Each party should track the NDAs they have signed, their duration, and expiration dates. It's common for an NDA to expire "X" years from the signature date, but the confidential information must be protected for "X" years after the NDA's expiration. If you don't understand when your confidentiality obligations expire, find an attorney who can read the agreement and advise you about that. 
  • Create a spreadsheet of all NDAs, keep it current, and send the link to all company personnel who may have occasion to confer with the other party to the NDA - or their competitor. This should help prevent your company's unintentional breach of the NDA by disclosing the other party's confidential information to their competitor.
  • Even with a NDA in place, be cautious of what you disclose to the other party. You should investigate the other party to determine if it has a good business reputation. Ask for credit references and a list of the party's customers and contact them to see if they have had any problems with that party. 
NDAs are valuable when properly and selectively used. Don't let the litigators in my profession become even more wealthy by filing suit against the parties "guilty" of NDA overuse! 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The BUSKLAW 2021 Year in Review - Brit English Sums It Up!

  I'm at a loss to describe 2021 using American English, sorry. AmE has grown tiresome. Don't believe me? Just turn on your local TV news and listen for how many times the news people use "prior" instead of "before" and pepper their speech with "as well," frequently tacking it on after using "also" in the same sentence, as in "It will also rain tomorrow as well." How can all be WELL when every other sentence ends with AS WELL? Warning: don't play a drinking game to count the number of  AS WELLs or you'll be pished (as they say in Scotland) in 10 minutes. Which reminds me of why we should be thankful for Brit English to describe 2021: it was another year that we good guys got knackered .   Consider: Covid continues unabated - now improved with variants (get your booster, wear a mask)! The peaceful transition of the U.S. government after the 2020 presidential election almost didn't happen (can you say "insurrectio...

The BUSKLAW Halloween 2022 Post: Stephen King's Asides on Poor Writing in Fairy Tale

  Having just read  Stephen King's Fairy Tale in time for Halloween, it's appropriate to examine his asides on poor writing included in the book. (BTW, Fairy Tale is a good read with King's typical well-executed character development, plot, and a great finish to the story. But you have like the whole Grimm fairy tale genre before you read his take on it.)  Stephen King doesn't tolerate anything less than crisp prose. When the story's hero, Charlie Reade, tries to read a book about the origins of fantasy and its place in the world matrix ("what a mouthful"), he can only scan it because: It was everything I hated about what I thought of as "hoity-toity" academic writing, full of five-dollar words and tortured syntax. Maybe that's intellectual laziness on my part, but maybe not. Later on, Charlie tries to focus on a particular chapter in the "origins of fantasy" book about the story of Jack and the Beanstalk but is put off by "t...

The BUSKLAW May Newsletter: The Foolhardy Practice of Using Faux Terms of Art in Your Contracts

  Most lawyers draft contracts. That's what lawyers do. And they use perceived terms of art ("TOAs") because they want to be paragons of contract-drafting precision. But here is where the canker gnaws:  the words that lawyers insert in their contracts as TOAs are actually not, potentially causing problems in clarity and interpretation. And as I've said time and again, these problems lead to disputes, and disputes lead to litigation, which is always time-consuming and expensive for the parties involved.  Let's first define TOAs in the legal context. According to Professor Bryan Garner in his Dictionary of Legal Usage , TOAs have specific, precise meanings that are "locked tight" and based on legal precedent. But then there are the faux TOAs, "whose meanings are often unhinged." Expert contract drafters, Garner says, know that clear, simple drafting is less subject to misinterpretation than using TOAs that are nothing more than "mere jargon....