Skip to main content

March 2015 Newsletter Addendum: How I Practice Law

I've created a monthly newsletter each month since last September - they are archived on the sidebar to the right of this page. I hope that you find the topics relevant to your business. But it has dawned on me that the newsletters don't touch on a subject that you may find interesting: how I practice law. So, let's remedy that:

  • Unlike many lawyers, I write - and revise - contracts in plain language (or "plain English," which is the same concept - just a bit more ethnocentric). The arguments for drafting contracts are stated in the articles that I wrote for the January and February, 2015 issues of the Michigan Bar Journal. (The links to these articles are also on the sidebar.) There is no good excuse for legal jargon. 
  • I try to be responsive to my clients. If a client calls or emails me and if I'm not immediately available, I try to answer within 24 hours with a substantive response (rather than simply, "I received your email and will look into it"). 
  • I'm not a law firm. A Michigan-based client hires me alone. I don't have an office to receive clients. I don't have any staff. (But I will gladly visit your office if here in west Michigan, and I never charge for my travel time.) I prefer electronic communications, not paper. I'm blessed to have a nice and quiet home work space, equipped with two printers, two scanners, a webcam for Skype, a recent-vintage desktop computer that is backed-up to an encrypted cloud, and Microsoft Office 365, which I heartily recommend. I also have several essential legal references, including many contract "forms" that I developed (with the help of colleagues) during my 34 years as in-house counsel for a major west Michigan-based retailer. Of course, contract forms mean little without the expertise to use them wisely and revise them as necessary!   
  • My hourly and fixed fee rates reflect my modest overhead. They also reflect the fact that I'm not a full-service or general practice attorney. And I don't represent individual clients, only Michigan businesses.
  • I enjoy drafting and negotiating information technology contracts, but I have other significant commercial expertise. As an in-house lawyer, I practiced in many commercial areas, including logistics, marketing, distribution, finance, eCommerce, cyber risk, intellectual property, corporate policy preparation, purchase orders, and acknowledgements for the sale of goods. If you contact me about a matter that is outside my expertise, I will promptly tell you so you can make other arrangements.  
  • My negotiating technique is "win-win." My success as an in-house lawyer was the result of close collaboration with my business clients and fair dealing with the other side. This made it easier to timely negotiate a mutually-beneficial contract. The same is true for my law practice now. 
So, that's how I practice law after my in-house legal career. As always, questions or comments are welcome. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The BUSKLAW June Newsletter: Forcing Business Behavior Changes Through Buried Contract Provisions: Salesforce and Camping World

As reported by  The Washington Post , business-software giant Salesforce  recently instituted a policy barring its retailer customers from using its technology to sell semi-automatic weapons, including the AR-15 used in numerous mass shootings. One such customer is  Camping World , whose Gander Outdoors division sells many "AR" and other semi-automatic rifles .  Rather than approach Camping World/Gander, a "leading" Salesforce customer, and negotiating the termination of their semi-automatic rifle sales in exchange for some benefit (such as a software discount), Salesforce was tricky. They buried a provision barring the sale of semi-automatic rifles in the acceptable-use policy  ("AUP") binding on Camping World/Gander: Salesforce wants to force Camping World/Gander to make a major change to its business model via an addition to their AUP that is irrelevant to their customer's licensed use of Salesforce software. And although sneaky, I bet tha
Post a Comment
Read more

The BUSKLAW Halloween 2022 Post: Stephen King's Asides on Poor Writing in Fairy Tale

  Having just read  Stephen King's Fairy Tale in time for Halloween, it's appropriate to examine his asides on poor writing included in the book. (BTW, Fairy Tale is a good read with King's typical well-executed character development, plot, and a great finish to the story. But you have like the whole Grimm fairy tale genre before you read his take on it.)  Stephen King doesn't tolerate anything less than crisp prose. When the story's hero, Charlie Reade, tries to read a book about the origins of fantasy and its place in the world matrix ("what a mouthful"), he can only scan it because: It was everything I hated about what I thought of as "hoity-toity" academic writing, full of five-dollar words and tortured syntax. Maybe that's intellectual laziness on my part, but maybe not. Later on, Charlie tries to focus on a particular chapter in the "origins of fantasy" book about the story of Jack and the Beanstalk but is put off by "t
Post a Comment
Read more

The BUSKLAW April Newsletter: A Force Majeure Clause for the New Millennium

(Author’s Note: I originally wrote this post for Y2K, but I’ve updated it using plain English.  Happy April Fool’s Day 2016!)             A standard force majeure contract clause, where "Acts of God" excuse one party from performing their obligations without that non-performance being a breach of contract, are so 20th Century. So what if fire, flood, hurricane, snowstorm, or riot excuse contractual non-performance. Those events are too mundane to contemplate! Contract lawyers desperately need a force majeure clause for the clear and present dangers of the new(er) millennium! So, as a public service to the legal profession, I’ve assumed the heavy burden of drafting a "new age" force majeure clause for my colleagues to freely use: Either party's non-performance of this agreement will be excused to the extent that it is caused by the occurrence of any of the following events or circumstances: (i) Alien abduction, alien invasion, alien cerebral possession,
Post a Comment
Read more