Skip to main content

March 2015 Newsletter Addendum: How I Practice Law

I've created a monthly newsletter each month since last September - they are archived on the sidebar to the right of this page. I hope that you find the topics relevant to your business. But it has dawned on me that the newsletters don't touch on a subject that you may find interesting: how I practice law. So, let's remedy that:

  • Unlike many lawyers, I write - and revise - contracts in plain language (or "plain English," which is the same concept - just a bit more ethnocentric). The arguments for drafting contracts are stated in the articles that I wrote for the January and February, 2015 issues of the Michigan Bar Journal. (The links to these articles are also on the sidebar.) There is no good excuse for legal jargon. 
  • I try to be responsive to my clients. If a client calls or emails me and if I'm not immediately available, I try to answer within 24 hours with a substantive response (rather than simply, "I received your email and will look into it"). 
  • I'm not a law firm. A Michigan-based client hires me alone. I don't have an office to receive clients. I don't have any staff. (But I will gladly visit your office if here in west Michigan, and I never charge for my travel time.) I prefer electronic communications, not paper. I'm blessed to have a nice and quiet home work space, equipped with two printers, two scanners, a webcam for Skype, a recent-vintage desktop computer that is backed-up to an encrypted cloud, and Microsoft Office 365, which I heartily recommend. I also have several essential legal references, including many contract "forms" that I developed (with the help of colleagues) during my 34 years as in-house counsel for a major west Michigan-based retailer. Of course, contract forms mean little without the expertise to use them wisely and revise them as necessary!   
  • My hourly and fixed fee rates reflect my modest overhead. They also reflect the fact that I'm not a full-service or general practice attorney. And I don't represent individual clients, only Michigan businesses.
  • I enjoy drafting and negotiating information technology contracts, but I have other significant commercial expertise. As an in-house lawyer, I practiced in many commercial areas, including logistics, marketing, distribution, finance, eCommerce, cyber risk, intellectual property, corporate policy preparation, purchase orders, and acknowledgements for the sale of goods. If you contact me about a matter that is outside my expertise, I will promptly tell you so you can make other arrangements.  
  • My negotiating technique is "win-win." My success as an in-house lawyer was the result of close collaboration with my business clients and fair dealing with the other side. This made it easier to timely negotiate a mutually-beneficial contract. The same is true for my law practice now. 
So, that's how I practice law after my in-house legal career. As always, questions or comments are welcome. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The BUSKLAW 2021 Year in Review - Brit English Sums It Up!

  I'm at a loss to describe 2021 using American English, sorry. AmE has grown tiresome. Don't believe me? Just turn on your local TV news and listen for how many times the news people use "prior" instead of "before" and pepper their speech with "as well," frequently tacking it on after using "also" in the same sentence, as in "It will also rain tomorrow as well." How can all be WELL when every other sentence ends with AS WELL? Warning: don't play a drinking game to count the number of  AS WELLs or you'll be pished (as they say in Scotland) in 10 minutes. Which reminds me of why we should be thankful for Brit English to describe 2021: it was another year that we good guys got knackered .   Consider: Covid continues unabated - now improved with variants (get your booster, wear a mask)! The peaceful transition of the U.S. government after the 2020 presidential election almost didn't happen (can you say "insurrectio...

The BUSKLAW Halloween 2022 Post: Stephen King's Asides on Poor Writing in Fairy Tale

  Having just read  Stephen King's Fairy Tale in time for Halloween, it's appropriate to examine his asides on poor writing included in the book. (BTW, Fairy Tale is a good read with King's typical well-executed character development, plot, and a great finish to the story. But you have like the whole Grimm fairy tale genre before you read his take on it.)  Stephen King doesn't tolerate anything less than crisp prose. When the story's hero, Charlie Reade, tries to read a book about the origins of fantasy and its place in the world matrix ("what a mouthful"), he can only scan it because: It was everything I hated about what I thought of as "hoity-toity" academic writing, full of five-dollar words and tortured syntax. Maybe that's intellectual laziness on my part, but maybe not. Later on, Charlie tries to focus on a particular chapter in the "origins of fantasy" book about the story of Jack and the Beanstalk but is put off by "t...

The BUSKLAW May Newsletter: The Foolhardy Practice of Using Faux Terms of Art in Your Contracts

  Most lawyers draft contracts. That's what lawyers do. And they use perceived terms of art ("TOAs") because they want to be paragons of contract-drafting precision. But here is where the canker gnaws:  the words that lawyers insert in their contracts as TOAs are actually not, potentially causing problems in clarity and interpretation. And as I've said time and again, these problems lead to disputes, and disputes lead to litigation, which is always time-consuming and expensive for the parties involved.  Let's first define TOAs in the legal context. According to Professor Bryan Garner in his Dictionary of Legal Usage , TOAs have specific, precise meanings that are "locked tight" and based on legal precedent. But then there are the faux TOAs, "whose meanings are often unhinged." Expert contract drafters, Garner says, know that clear, simple drafting is less subject to misinterpretation than using TOAs that are nothing more than "mere jargon....