Skip to main content

Focus on Letters of Intent: Useful Business Tool or the Devil's Invention?


Consider the letter of intent (also known as a "memorandum of understanding," a "preliminary agreement," or other innocuous-sounding title). Some business folks believe that a surefire way to do a deal at the last minute (and no reason to bother their lawyer at 5 PM on a Friday!) is to sign a letter of intent ("LOI"). The typical LOI is a short agreement that states some - but not all - of the terms of the deal, contemplating that the parties will eventually sign a complete or definitive agreement ("DA") that will state all of the deal's provisions, both business and legal.

LOIs are inherently troublesome (an "Invention of the Devil" according to one lawyer) because the parties to a LOI may disagree on its legal significance. One party may view the LOI as obligating the parties to sign a DA at a future date, even if a disagreement develops over the provisions in the DA that the LOI didn't address. The other party may regard the LOI as merely a non-binding understanding of the deal, with no obligation to ever sign a DA. This misunderstanding is a fertile field for resolution by time-consuming and expensive litigation or arbitration.  

Unless a LOI contains an appropriate disclaimer (discussed below), Michigan courts will enforce a LOI if it contains all of the material and essential terms of the proposed future DA. And a jury (or arbitration panel) decides what these material and essential terms consist of. Further, some Michigan courts have held that even if some contractual provisions normally included in DAs in the particular industry are absent from the LOI, the LOI is legally binding if the parties used language stating their intention to be obligated. According to this legal precedent, the presence or absence of essential contract provisions is but one element in the evidential panorama underlying a factual finding of intent and responsibility.  So, Michigan case law does not lead to a confident outcome in whether a LOI is a binding document or merely the parties' understanding of what a DA could include, with no obligation to enter into a DA. 

But Michigan courts have decided that appropriate disclaimer language will make a LOI unenforceable if that language is unambiguous and explicit. One Michigan court approved the following language as an adequate disclaimer:


  • ...all legal obligations of the parties hereto shall be set forth in the [definitive] agreement and other documents negotiated by the parties and their respective counsel...This letter of intent is not an offer (and acceptance hereof does not constitute an agreement) to consummate this transaction or to enter into the [definitive] agreement.
  • (Note: there are much better ways to state this disclaimer using plain English!)


Regardless of what side of the deal you are on - and even with an effective disclaimer -LOIs are more trouble than they're worth. If the deal matters that much, put the extra effort in doing a DA immediately (even if the business folks and their lawyers have to work nights and weekends to get it done - they'll survive). Don't give the devil his due!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The BUSKLAW June Newsletter: Forcing Business Behavior Changes Through Buried Contract Provisions: Salesforce and Camping World

As reported by  The Washington Post , business-software giant Salesforce  recently instituted a policy barring its retailer customers from using its technology to sell semi-automatic weapons, including the AR-15 used in numerous mass shootings. One such customer is  Camping World , whose Gander Outdoors division sells many "AR" and other semi-automatic rifles .  Rather than approach Camping World/Gander, a "leading" Salesforce customer, and negotiating the termination of their semi-automatic rifle sales in exchange for some benefit (such as a software discount), Salesforce was tricky. They buried a provision barring the sale of semi-automatic rifles in the acceptable-use policy  ("AUP") binding on Camping World/Gander: Salesforce wants to force Camping World/Gander to make a major change to its business model via an addition to their AUP that is irrelevant to their customer's licensed use of Salesforce software. And although sneaky, I bet tha

The BUSKLAW Halloween 2022 Post: Stephen King's Asides on Poor Writing in Fairy Tale

  Having just read  Stephen King's Fairy Tale in time for Halloween, it's appropriate to examine his asides on poor writing included in the book. (BTW, Fairy Tale is a good read with King's typical well-executed character development, plot, and a great finish to the story. But you have like the whole Grimm fairy tale genre before you read his take on it.)  Stephen King doesn't tolerate anything less than crisp prose. When the story's hero, Charlie Reade, tries to read a book about the origins of fantasy and its place in the world matrix ("what a mouthful"), he can only scan it because: It was everything I hated about what I thought of as "hoity-toity" academic writing, full of five-dollar words and tortured syntax. Maybe that's intellectual laziness on my part, but maybe not. Later on, Charlie tries to focus on a particular chapter in the "origins of fantasy" book about the story of Jack and the Beanstalk but is put off by "t

The BUSKLAW April Newsletter: A Force Majeure Clause for the New Millennium

(Author’s Note: I originally wrote this post for Y2K, but I’ve updated it using plain English.  Happy April Fool’s Day 2016!)             A standard force majeure contract clause, where "Acts of God" excuse one party from performing their obligations without that non-performance being a breach of contract, are so 20th Century. So what if fire, flood, hurricane, snowstorm, or riot excuse contractual non-performance. Those events are too mundane to contemplate! Contract lawyers desperately need a force majeure clause for the clear and present dangers of the new(er) millennium! So, as a public service to the legal profession, I’ve assumed the heavy burden of drafting a "new age" force majeure clause for my colleagues to freely use: Either party's non-performance of this agreement will be excused to the extent that it is caused by the occurrence of any of the following events or circumstances: (i) Alien abduction, alien invasion, alien cerebral possession,