Skip to main content

The BUSKLAW August Newsletter: Ethical Contracting and "Gotchas"




It's August - the dog days of summer. The time when the heat is to some of us a bother rather than a comfort. So as we enjoy our favorite adult beverage around a sprinkler, pool, or larger body of water, let's talk about a vital purpose of any contract: the promotion of trust and transparency between the parties. Or to put it another way: a contract should express the parties' honest business purpose in a clear and comprehensive way, with no sneaky surprises ("gotchas") that could someday surface to cause unforeseen problems. 

 A short amendment to a contract between my client and a major vendor once crossed my desk. The purpose was to adjust the pricing formula of a commodity that my client purchased from the vendor. The parties had been doing business together for the last seven years without any problem requiring a lawyer's involvement. 

 I was reading the amendment and was about to approve it when a section captioned Release caught my eye. There, sticking out like a Baby Ruth in the Bushwood Country Club swimming pool, was the provision that my client would unilaterally release the vendor from any and all causes of action, liability, claims, etc., “known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected… accruing at any time before the effective date of this Amendment.”

 Whew! A unilateral blanket release favoring the vendor in a routine pricing amendment. Really? 

 When I crossed out this section and returned it to my client (who then sent it on to the vendor), he was told that if we didn’t sign the amendment without the deletion within the next 48 hours, the new (and more favorable pricing formula) would not go into effect. I immediately emailed the vendor representative to ask if I could speak to his lawyer right away. And I told him in blunt but professional terms what I thought about including this section given the issue-free history of the parties' relationship. The release provision soon came back revised to how it should have read originally i.e., limiting it to only pricing discrepancies for the commodity that might have existed before the effective date of the amendment. (Even so, I received a sign-off from my client's merchandising and vendor finance departments that this language was acceptable given the fact that the goods were commodities with short payment terms and no promotional allowances.)

 Including a unilateral blanket release without explanation is not ethical contracting. By this action, the vendor was not treating its customers with "dignity and respect" (a favorite phrase of the late, great Fred Meijer). I will never trust this vendor again (and neither will my client) and why should I?  If they tried to get away with this, what other “gotcha” do they have in their quiver to foist on unsuspecting customers?

A close cousin to a "gotcha" is deliberate contractual ambiguity. We'll examine this topic in an upcoming BUSKLAW newsletter addendum. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The BUSKLAW Halloween 2022 Post: Stephen King's Asides on Poor Writing in Fairy Tale

  Having just read  Stephen King's Fairy Tale in time for Halloween, it's appropriate to examine his asides on poor writing included in the book. (BTW, Fairy Tale is a good read with King's typical well-executed character development, plot, and a great finish to the story. But you have like the whole Grimm fairy tale genre before you read his take on it.)  Stephen King doesn't tolerate anything less than crisp prose. When the story's hero, Charlie Reade, tries to read a book about the origins of fantasy and its place in the world matrix ("what a mouthful"), he can only scan it because: It was everything I hated about what I thought of as "hoity-toity" academic writing, full of five-dollar words and tortured syntax. Maybe that's intellectual laziness on my part, but maybe not. Later on, Charlie tries to focus on a particular chapter in the "origins of fantasy" book about the story of Jack and the Beanstalk but is put off by "t...
Post a Comment
Read more

The BUSKLAW May Newsletter: The Foolhardy Practice of Using Faux Terms of Art in Your Contracts

  Most lawyers draft contracts. That's what lawyers do. And they use perceived terms of art ("TOAs") because they want to be paragons of contract-drafting precision. But here is where the canker gnaws:  the words that lawyers insert in their contracts as TOAs are actually not, potentially causing problems in clarity and interpretation. And as I've said time and again, these problems lead to disputes, and disputes lead to litigation, which is always time-consuming and expensive for the parties involved.  Let's first define TOAs in the legal context. According to Professor Bryan Garner in his Dictionary of Legal Usage , TOAs have specific, precise meanings that are "locked tight" and based on legal precedent. But then there are the faux TOAs, "whose meanings are often unhinged." Expert contract drafters, Garner says, know that clear, simple drafting is less subject to misinterpretation than using TOAs that are nothing more than "mere jargon....
Post a Comment
Read more

The BUSKLAW May Newsletter: Another Trump NDA Bites the Dust!

  In my August 2020 newsletter, we discussed lessons from the New York Supreme Court's rejection of the Trump family NDA. Drafting lesson #1 is the need to specifically describe the information covered by the NDA rather than vague references.  Unfortunately for Trump, this lesson wasn't learned, as evidenced by a recent New York U.S. District Court decision in the case of  J essica Denson v Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.   Plaintiff Denson was employed as a national phone bank administrator for the 2016 Trump campaign. Before she was hired, she signed the standard Trump employment contract containing broad non-disclosure and non-disparagement provisions. Confidential Information was defined as: ...all information (whether or not embodied in any media) of a private, proprietary or confidential nature or that Mr. Trump insists remain private or confidential, including, but not limited to, any information with respect to the personal life, political affairs, and/o...
Post a Comment
Read more