Skip to main content

The BUSKLAW January Newsletter: Catching Typographical Errors in Contracts

“Career Path” is an overused term to describe how we should conduct our professional lives to reach our full potential. In my experience, most self-help books on this subject assume that we have more control over our lives than we actually do. The old adage, “Man proposes, God disposes,” is not evident in these books. And yet there are ways for contracts lawyers to reach their full potential - how about by catching those pesky typographical errors ("typos")? 

Is there anything more rewarding to a contracts lawyer than catching a typographical error? Of course not. I once did a long and complicated real estate license agreement, only to have my client point out the fact that on page 39, section 1, paragraph A, subsection (i), clause (z) of the contract I drafted, the word “thee” should be “the.” I can’t tell you enough about the warm fuzzy feeling that this observation created in the depths of my soul! 

At best, typographical errors are embarrassing and have only minimal substantive impact on the contract; at  worst, they can create ambiguity that may engender a dispute. So the truth is that typos matter. 

There is evidence that the contracts lawyer who catches typos is rock star - lawyer material, as shown in this short (documentary?) video from the folks at bitterlawyer.com: 




The unfortunate side effect is that catching typos isn’t sexy. And non-lawyers may have trouble understanding what the fuss is all about. 

Here's my strategy for detecting and removing typos:
  • Don't look for typos on your computer screen. Print out the document and look for them on paper. Studies show that we retain more of what we read on paper compared to what we read on a computer screen. 
  • Use your word processor's spell checker but beware that it may not accurately show whether the words flagged are in fact typos. Or as in the "the" vs. "thee" example above, your spell checker may think that "thee" is not a typo. 
  • Review the document for typos, do something else for at least a few hours, and then review it again. One read-through of the document is not enough to detect errors. As any writer will tell you, it is important to set aside your work and let it become fresh in your mind before you read it again. 
  • There is no shame in correcting a typo or two if discovered by your client - or the opposite party. A sure way to win brownie points in negotiating with the other side is to respectfully point out a typo in the contract that they drafted. 
Whether you are a contracts lawyer (with or without rock star aspirations) or a business person who works with contracts, a good - but not romantic - new year resolution for 2016 is to redouble your efforts to stamp-out typos. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The BUSKLAW June Newsletter: Forcing Business Behavior Changes Through Buried Contract Provisions: Salesforce and Camping World

As reported by  The Washington Post , business-software giant Salesforce  recently instituted a policy barring its retailer customers from using its technology to sell semi-automatic weapons, including the AR-15 used in numerous mass shootings. One such customer is  Camping World , whose Gander Outdoors division sells many "AR" and other semi-automatic rifles .  Rather than approach Camping World/Gander, a "leading" Salesforce customer, and negotiating the termination of their semi-automatic rifle sales in exchange for some benefit (such as a software discount), Salesforce was tricky. They buried a provision barring the sale of semi-automatic rifles in the acceptable-use policy  ("AUP") binding on Camping World/Gander: Salesforce wants to force Camping World/Gander to make a major change to its business model via an addition to their AUP that is irrelevant to their customer's licensed use of Salesforce software. And although sneaky, I bet tha

The BUSKLAW Halloween 2022 Post: Stephen King's Asides on Poor Writing in Fairy Tale

  Having just read  Stephen King's Fairy Tale in time for Halloween, it's appropriate to examine his asides on poor writing included in the book. (BTW, Fairy Tale is a good read with King's typical well-executed character development, plot, and a great finish to the story. But you have like the whole Grimm fairy tale genre before you read his take on it.)  Stephen King doesn't tolerate anything less than crisp prose. When the story's hero, Charlie Reade, tries to read a book about the origins of fantasy and its place in the world matrix ("what a mouthful"), he can only scan it because: It was everything I hated about what I thought of as "hoity-toity" academic writing, full of five-dollar words and tortured syntax. Maybe that's intellectual laziness on my part, but maybe not. Later on, Charlie tries to focus on a particular chapter in the "origins of fantasy" book about the story of Jack and the Beanstalk but is put off by "t

The BUSKLAW April Newsletter: A Force Majeure Clause for the New Millennium

(Author’s Note: I originally wrote this post for Y2K, but I’ve updated it using plain English.  Happy April Fool’s Day 2016!)             A standard force majeure contract clause, where "Acts of God" excuse one party from performing their obligations without that non-performance being a breach of contract, are so 20th Century. So what if fire, flood, hurricane, snowstorm, or riot excuse contractual non-performance. Those events are too mundane to contemplate! Contract lawyers desperately need a force majeure clause for the clear and present dangers of the new(er) millennium! So, as a public service to the legal profession, I’ve assumed the heavy burden of drafting a "new age" force majeure clause for my colleagues to freely use: Either party's non-performance of this agreement will be excused to the extent that it is caused by the occurrence of any of the following events or circumstances: (i) Alien abduction, alien invasion, alien cerebral possession,