Skip to main content

The BUSKLAW December Newsletter: Consider a Legal Audit of Your Contracts

Most of you are business professionals and thus are involved with contracts. Depending on the nature of your enterprise, you have various contracts in force, for example: 

>sales agreements
>purchase agreements
>real estate leases
>purchase order terms and conditions
>software license and maintenance agreements
>service agreements
>equipment maintenance agreements
>consulting agreements
>contractor agreements
>employment agreements
>non-disclosure agreements
>non-compete agreements
>transportation or logistics agreements
>financial institution agreements

Perhaps you work with these documents on a regular basis and are familiar with their content. Or you pay a high-priced law firm to do that for you. More commonly, however, you keep these documents in a file cabinet, rarely review them, and only call your expensive big-firm lawyer when there are problems with the transaction. Whatever the case, consider the advisability of a legal audit to focus on the following:
  • Are your contracts properly signed, dated, and legible to the reader? I once had a client who had the other party sign its contracts but never signed them itself, thinking that if something went wrong, it could argue that it never agreed to the contract. This is a poor - and fruitless - approach to contract administration. And I once had a judge refuse to admit an opposing party's contract into evidence because the text was unreadable. 
  • Are your contracts still in force or have they (intentionally or not) expired? Do you know the steps to renew (or terminate) them?
  • Do you have multiple contracts with the same party that may conflict with each other? You may have a master agreement and an operating agreement, a term sheet, or a statement of work with an outside party. But if you don't carefully specify what agreement controls, you may find yourself in a court battle as my colleague D.C. Toedt discusses here.
  • Do your contracts contain ambiguous and confusing legal jargon? Examples of legal jargon (and suggested remedies) are discussed in this article that I wrote for the Michigan Bar Journal. Legal jargon is more than a nuisance; it can lead to costly litigation about what the parties intended. And there are no excuses for legal jargon, as my colleague Michael Braem and I point out in a recently-published Michigan Bar Journal article.
  • Do you have a contract management system? The system can be as a simple as a table or spreadsheet or as complex as an enterprise software solution. But due diligence demands that you keep track of your contracts, including key provisions, expiration dates, and renewal deadlines.
  • Finally, do you have a corporate records retention policy (with a designated record retention manager) that requires the preservation of your contracts for the proper period? If not, you could get in trouble for destruction of evidence if you discard a contract that is (or becomes) the subject of a lawsuit.
The purpose of a legal audit is quite simple: find potential problems with your contracts now and fix them before they can lead to a costly and time-consuming legal dispute. 
A legal audit of your contracts makes sense even if you already have an established relationship with a lawyer who may have prepared your contracts. The old adage that "two heads are better than one" makes good sense here. And my view is that even experienced corporate lawyers conducting a legal audit for their clients shouldn't "get rich" in the process but instead charge a reasonable fixed fee largely based on the number of contracts reviewed. (You'll recall that my approach to practicing law is stated here.)

So as you are getting in the holiday spirit with inspirational music and stories of Xmas long ago, consider a legal audit of your contracts as an appropriate "gift" to your bottom line.   

If you find this post worthwhile, please consider sharing it with your colleagues. The link to this blog is and my website is www.busklaw.comThanks!  


Popular posts from this blog

The BUSKLAW May Newsletter: Is There a Moral Imperative to Plain English? Part 1 - Examples

"The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed." 

Thus begins Stephen King's epic story of the gunslinger, Roland Deschain, and the popular Dark Tower series of novels describing his adventures. But King didn't have to write this sentence that way; he could have consulted with the typical lawyer, politician, or company PR department first. Had he done so, the sentence may have appeared so:

"The bad hombre who was dressed mostly in dark clothing and running fast across an arid land was pursued by a multi-armed, extremely dangerous, and notorious vigilante."
The difference in these two sentences is clear. King's concise short sentence creates an image that grabs the reader's attention and raises provocative questions. Who is the man in black? Who is the gunslinger? Why is he after the man in black? But the Bizarro World Stephen King sentence - with its ethnic slur, passive voice, ambiguity, suppositions, and superfluous adjectives …

A BUSKLAW Newsletter Aside: Links to My Michigan Bar Journal Plain-Language Articles

Since my retirement from in-house corporate law in 2014, I've written or co-written several articles about using plain-language in contracts for the Michigan Bar Journal. And a new article has recently appeared in the October 2017 issue. But those articles haven't been a lone endeavor in any sense; I've had several plain-language experts give me their input along the way:
Plain English Scholar and WMU-Cooley Law School Distinguished Professor Emeritus Joe Kimblewho invited me to write for the Journal to begin with and has since freely given me editorial advice that not only benefits the particular article du jour but also helps my legal writing generally. And a hat tip to Journal Editor Linda Novak who has put, editorially-speaking, the "frosting on the cake" before publication of these articles. Michael Braem, J.D., Contract Manager of the Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, who has co-authored some of the articles with me. Michael has also becom…

The BUSKLAW March Newsletter: Of Pie and Plain English

I love pie and plain English about equally, although plain English is less fattening. Pie - especially the caramel toffee apple variety - for Thanksgiving is especially grand because afterward, you can eat leftover pie for breakfast without a lot of guilt. And chances are that the rest of the household won't consider pie a suitable breakfast food, so you're good to go. 

Grand Rapids, Michigan, is blessed with an excellent source of pies: Sweetie-licious. Until recently, they had two locations: one in GR's Downtown Market and the other in beautiful East Grand Rapids. I grew up in EGR and still fond of the place. So it was very convenient to journey across town to Sweetie's EGR location to pick up a pie for holidays (or when the pie lust grew to be unbearable).

Because life isn't fair, Sweetie-licious closed its EGR location several months ago. (But mercifully their Downtown Market location is still going strong.) When I sauntered past their empty EGR storefront recent…