Skip to main content

The BUSKLAW July Newsletter: Addendum to the Moral Imperative of Plain Language: The Judeo-Christian Imperative


(Note: you may want to stop here if you aren't a spiritual person in the Judeo-Christian tradition.) 

As an introduction to this post, I'll share my religious background. I was brought up in the Protestant tradition with the Dutch Reformed twist. But when friends ask me what I really believe in, I hedge my bets based on:
  • I went to Hope College, affiliated with the Reformed Church in America. 
  • I went to Notre Dame Law School, a respected Catholic institution.
  • I'm a quarter Jewish and was cared for by a fairly authentic Jewish mom (who was thankfully tempered by my 100% Danish father). 
So at the pearly gates, I'll show Saint Peter (or whoever) the three Protestant-Catholic-Jew entry tickets reflecting this background, and hopefully one (or more) will allow passage. 

So now that I've disclosed my broad-minded belief system, here's my thesis: using plain language furthers the Christian and Jewish faiths. 

Contemporary Christian evangelist Rob Bell talks about ways in which Christians can echo Christ's resurrection in this video. At 2:02 in the piece, he describes that every "fair and honest act in business and trade...belong to God's good world." We've already seen how the twin evils of legalese and bureaucratese distort what is fair and honest in our society. So avoiding them furthers God's plans for his creation and enables us to advance to a higher state of awareness. 

On the Jewish side, many Jews practice tikkun olam (literally "repair of the world"), an aspiration to behave and act constructively and beneficially. As the Wiki states: "It's the idea that Jews bear responsibility not only for their own moral, spiritual, and material welfare but also for the welfare of society at large. To the ears of contemporary pluralistic Rabbis, the term connotes 'the establishment of Godly qualities throughout the world'." This goal is hardly different than what Rob Bell is talking about! Go figure. 

Regarding contract language, it's well-established that God and the Devil love contracts. We have God's contract with Abraham in the Old Testament, and the various contracts for souls proffered by the Devil. While the former is written in plain language, the latter assuredly is not, if only because it's impossible to cover all the loopholes of soul forfeiture, so the Devil uses obfuscation to hide that fact. 

What words flow from your keyboard, and how are they structured? Are you stuck in the mire of gobbledygook? Or is your business and legal writing clear and concise and so advances God's purpose in a small yet meaningful way?  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The BUSKLAW May Newsletter: Is There a Moral Imperative to Plain English? Part 1 - Examples

"The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed." 

Thus begins Stephen King's epic story of the gunslinger, Roland Deschain, and the popular Dark Tower series of novels describing his adventures. But King didn't have to write this sentence that way; he could have consulted with the typical lawyer, politician, or company PR department first. Had he done so, the sentence may have appeared so:

"The bad hombre who was dressed mostly in dark clothing and running fast across an arid land was pursued by a multi-armed, extremely dangerous, and notorious vigilante."
The difference in these two sentences is clear. King's concise short sentence creates an image that grabs the reader's attention and raises provocative questions. Who is the man in black? Who is the gunslinger? Why is he after the man in black? But the Bizarro World Stephen King sentence - with its ethnic slur, passive voice, ambiguity, suppositions, and superfluous adjectives …

The BUSKLAW July Newsletter: Horsing Around with Non-Compete Clauses

Non-compete provisions are part and parcel of many employment agreements. But these provisions must be carefully drafted to be enforceable. There are three sure-fire ways to have a court invalidate your non-compete clause without much judicial cogitation:
Failure to provide a reasonable duration for the clause;Failure to restrict the operation of the clause to a reasonable geographic area; andFailure to establish a protectable business interest as the subject of the clause.The first point is easy to grasp. In Michigan, you are on solid legal ground if the duration of your non-compete clause doesn't exceed one year. And you are probably okay if you add a year to that. But you're walking on quicksand if your non-compete provision lasts longer than two years. 
The second point is a bit more complicated. Courts don't like to enforce a non-compete clause if its geographical scope is too wide. For example, if I'm in the packaged ice business and sell my product mostly to retai…

The BUSKLAW September Newsletter: Lawyers and Their Goofy Words - and What to Do About It

Growing up, I was told that lawyers were smart cookies. After all, getting a law degree isn't an easy task. You first go to college and find a subject that is best suited to how your brain works so that you can maintain a high GPA. In my case, I quickly discovered that I wasn't a good fit for the "hard sciences." So I took a lot of Political Science and English courses, learned how to write fairly well, suffered through the tedious law school aptitude test on October 20, 1973, graduated with a B.A. degree in 1974 and then went on to law school. There, I endured a legal education infused with the Socratic method (here's an example), suffered occasional migraines (because some of my law professors were truly smart but couldn't teach) and graduated with my law degree on Mother's Day, 1977. Passed the Michigan bar exam and by God, became an honest-to-goodness lawyer in November of 1977!

So having gone through undergraduate studies, law school, and the bar exam…