Skip to main content

The BUSKLAW April Newsletter: Uncommon (Contract) Clauses and Where to Find Them (first post in a sometimes series)

(With a wizardly hat tip to J.K. Rowling's Fantastic Beasts: 
So you're the guy with the case library full of monsters uncommon contract clauses, huh?)

In the realm of reading and writing contracts, it's best not to ignore the "fine print." This is especially true when it comes to online terms and conditions that can be found at just about every commercial website. You visit the website and agree to its terms and conditions (usually by clicking on an "I agree" button). But only the courageous will marshal their mental prowess and confront the dense legal jargon and other blatant drafting errors that are rife in this internet stuff. 

The price of ignoring online terms and conditions can be high. The defense that you didn't actually read the terms and conditions is weak. You can be bound to a waiver of a jury trial, agree to arbitrate any dispute in a far away jurisdiction, or consent to an unrealistic damages limitation. 

Or you can agree to sell your soul under an "immortal soul clause."

That is what the online U.K. gaming store GameStation did on April Fool's Day 2010 with this provision:

In placing an order via this Web site (sic) on the first day of the fourth month of the year 2010 Anno Domini, you agree to grant Us a non-transferable option to claim, for now and for ever (sic) more, your immortal soul. Should We wish to exercise this option, you agree to surrender your immortal soul, and any claim you may have on it, within 5 (five) working days of receiving written notification (sic) from gamestation.co.uk or one of its duly authorized minions. 

As the Huffington Post reported, only 12% of GameStation purchasers noticed the clause on April 1, 2010, and clicked on the handy "click here to nullify your soul transfer" button; the remaining 88% (7500) sold their souls to GameStation. But no worries - GameStation subsequently nullified all claims to their customers' souls. (In so doing, they arguably relinquished a valuable asset that could have been sold to the highest diabolical bidder. Can you say "shareholder lawsuit"?)

Gamestation's immortal soul contract clause is only the tip of the uncommon contract clause iceberg. There are lots of them in the wild, and some are not so funny. Stay tuned for more uncommon clauses - and where to find them. 

 Finally, if you have a website, you should make sure that you not only have a coherent set of terms and conditions but also that they comply with the laws of the States that you do business in. If you sell goods from your website, consider: 
  • Warranty provisions, limits, and exceptions;
  • Provisions that limit your liability to your customers and how disputes are handled; 
  • A privacy policy addressing how you safeguard customer data, including customer credit card information if you keep it; 
  • Business FAQs, including how your goods are shipped to your customers; procedures for return of and credit for defective goods; and how you notify customers of delayed shipping dates and out-of-stock items. 
A legal audit of your website terms and conditions - preferably by someone other than the attorney who prepared them - would be money well spent! I regard this work as a "loss leader," so my usual modest hourly fee to review website terms and conditions is (wait for it...) even more modest.  
____________________________________

If you find this post worthwhile, please consider sharing it with your colleagues. The link to this blog is www.busklaw.blogspot.com and my website is www.busklaw.com. And my email address is busklaw@charter.net. Thanks!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The BUSKLAW Halloween 2022 Post: Stephen King's Asides on Poor Writing in Fairy Tale

  Having just read  Stephen King's Fairy Tale in time for Halloween, it's appropriate to examine his asides on poor writing included in the book. (BTW, Fairy Tale is a good read with King's typical well-executed character development, plot, and a great finish to the story. But you have like the whole Grimm fairy tale genre before you read his take on it.)  Stephen King doesn't tolerate anything less than crisp prose. When the story's hero, Charlie Reade, tries to read a book about the origins of fantasy and its place in the world matrix ("what a mouthful"), he can only scan it because: It was everything I hated about what I thought of as "hoity-toity" academic writing, full of five-dollar words and tortured syntax. Maybe that's intellectual laziness on my part, but maybe not. Later on, Charlie tries to focus on a particular chapter in the "origins of fantasy" book about the story of Jack and the Beanstalk but is put off by "t
Post a Comment
Read more

The BUSKLAW 2021 Year in Review - Brit English Sums It Up!

  I'm at a loss to describe 2021 using American English, sorry. AmE has grown tiresome. Don't believe me? Just turn on your local TV news and listen for how many times the news people use "prior" instead of "before" and pepper their speech with "as well," frequently tacking it on after using "also" in the same sentence, as in "It will also rain tomorrow as well." How can all be WELL when every other sentence ends with AS WELL? Warning: don't play a drinking game to count the number of  AS WELLs or you'll be pished (as they say in Scotland) in 10 minutes. Which reminds me of why we should be thankful for Brit English to describe 2021: it was another year that we good guys got knackered .   Consider: Covid continues unabated - now improved with variants (get your booster, wear a mask)! The peaceful transition of the U.S. government after the 2020 presidential election almost didn't happen (can you say "insurrectio
Post a Comment
Read more

The BUSKLAW December Newsletter: Finding the "Good" on Xmas (and Nouns That Must Remain Plural)

Some folks may believe that writing well and Christmas have little in common, but I dispelled that notion two years ago in  my post about writing well on Christmas . And I have uncovered additional evidence for this holiday season.  I wasn't looking for that evidence, but it popped up in a sales contract that I was reading. The line was something like, "If any Good is nonconforming...." Wait a second. How can the "Good" be non-conforming? Wouldn't that fall to the province of the "Bad"? Then it hit me: the drafter was using "Good" as the singular of "Goods," a term of art defined in the Uniform Commercial Code ("UCC"), the statute regulating the sale of Goods adopted by almost every State.  But not "Good." The UCC doesn't use that word. The reason is simple. Would you walk into your local dry cleaners and ask "Is my pant ready?" You would likely get a quizzical expression from the clerk who mi
Post a Comment
Read more