Skip to main content

The BUSKLAW December Newsletter: A "Condition" Does Not a "Promise" Make

It has been called black gold and Texas tea. It can make hillbillies rich enough to move to a Beverly Hills mansion. If you own some acreage, you might have it and not know it. In the early 1900s, speculators (colorfully called "wildcatters") would look for it and if found, they often became today's equivalent of Job and Gates. And Michigan had it in abundance. 

 We are talking about crude oil. Even with market fluctuations and oil's effect on global warming, you can still make some money having it extracted from your land. Just ask the Allens of Pennsylvania, who had high hopes when the SWEPI company came calling to look for oil on their property. So the Allens signed SWEPI's mineral rights lease that stated in part:

 [This Agreement] is made on the condition that within 60 days from the Effective Date of this lease, [SWEPI] shall pay to [Allens] the sum of $2,000 per acre for the first year.

 The 60 days came and went and SWEPI didn't pay a dime to the Allens. Allens sued. SWEPI defended with the argument that they weren't required to pay Allens because the agreement was nothing but an option contract; it only gave SWEPI the right to rent the land for oil and gas exploration if SWEPI paid Allens the required sum, which SWEPI wasn't obligated to do. The Pennsylvania court agreed and dismissed Allens' suit (Allen v. SWEPI, L.P., No. 4:18-CV-01179).

The Allens failed to consider the word "condition." Had they done so (or retained an experienced lawyer for that purpose), they would have concluded that there was no agreement to explore for oil unless SWEPI paid them, and nothing in the agreement required that payment. There was no promise that SWEPI would pay Allens anything.  

 The difference between a contractual promise and a condition can be tricky. According to John Trentacosta in his Michigan Contract Law (2d ed.) treatise, Michigan courts generally define a "condition" as a fact or event which the parties intend to exist or take place before there is a right to performance. And as the Allens discovered, if that fact or event doesn't take place, you have your "lump of coal." (Hat tip to Professor Stacey Lantagne for bringing this case to my attention in her excellent ContractsProf Blog.) 

 Have you searched your contracts for "red flag" words such as "option" or "condition"? These words may be fine when used in certain ways but ruin your expectations when used in other ways. Best hire a good lawyer to parse out what these words mean in your contracts! 
____________________________________
If you find this post worthwhile, please consider sharing it with your colleagues. The link to this blog is www.busklaw.blogspot.com and my website is www.busklaw.com. And my email address is busklaw@charter.net. Thanks!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The BUSKLAW May Newsletter: The Foolhardy Practice of Using Faux Terms of Art in Your Contracts

  Most lawyers draft contracts. That's what lawyers do. And they use perceived terms of art ("TOAs") because they want to be paragons of contract-drafting precision. But here is where the canker gnaws:  the words that lawyers insert in their contracts as TOAs are actually not, potentially causing problems in clarity and interpretation. And as I've said time and again, these problems lead to disputes, and disputes lead to litigation, which is always time-consuming and expensive for the parties involved.  Let's first define TOAs in the legal context. According to Professor Bryan Garner in his Dictionary of Legal Usage , TOAs have specific, precise meanings that are "locked tight" and based on legal precedent. But then there are the faux TOAs, "whose meanings are often unhinged." Expert contract drafters, Garner says, know that clear, simple drafting is less subject to misinterpretation than using TOAs that are nothing more than "mere jargon....
Post a Comment
Read more

The BUSKLAW Halloween 2022 Post: Stephen King's Asides on Poor Writing in Fairy Tale

  Having just read  Stephen King's Fairy Tale in time for Halloween, it's appropriate to examine his asides on poor writing included in the book. (BTW, Fairy Tale is a good read with King's typical well-executed character development, plot, and a great finish to the story. But you have like the whole Grimm fairy tale genre before you read his take on it.)  Stephen King doesn't tolerate anything less than crisp prose. When the story's hero, Charlie Reade, tries to read a book about the origins of fantasy and its place in the world matrix ("what a mouthful"), he can only scan it because: It was everything I hated about what I thought of as "hoity-toity" academic writing, full of five-dollar words and tortured syntax. Maybe that's intellectual laziness on my part, but maybe not. Later on, Charlie tries to focus on a particular chapter in the "origins of fantasy" book about the story of Jack and the Beanstalk but is put off by "t...
Post a Comment
Read more

The BUSKLAW May Newsletter: Another Trump NDA Bites the Dust!

  In my August 2020 newsletter, we discussed lessons from the New York Supreme Court's rejection of the Trump family NDA. Drafting lesson #1 is the need to specifically describe the information covered by the NDA rather than vague references.  Unfortunately for Trump, this lesson wasn't learned, as evidenced by a recent New York U.S. District Court decision in the case of  J essica Denson v Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.   Plaintiff Denson was employed as a national phone bank administrator for the 2016 Trump campaign. Before she was hired, she signed the standard Trump employment contract containing broad non-disclosure and non-disparagement provisions. Confidential Information was defined as: ...all information (whether or not embodied in any media) of a private, proprietary or confidential nature or that Mr. Trump insists remain private or confidential, including, but not limited to, any information with respect to the personal life, political affairs, and/o...
Post a Comment
Read more