Skip to main content

The BUSKLAW November Newsletter: About the U.S. Army's Extraterrestrial Technology Acquisition Contract!


This post would appear to be a Halloween prank, but it isn't. On October 10, 2019, the U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command signed a contract [or in government parlance, a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA)] with To the Stars Academy of Arts and Science, Inc. for the acquisition of the latter's ET(?) technology. The entire contract is available here, but I'll save you from the content that isn't worth your time.  

But first some history. Once there was a punk rock group called Blink 182, founded by Tom DeLonge. Tom eventually became more enthused about UFOs than rock music and decided to seriously study unexplained aerial phenomena (UAP). He claims to have formed relationships with top government officials to eventually disclose to the public what's behind UAP. In the meantime, Tom formed a public corporation, To the Stars Academy (TSA), to be a "revolutionary collaboration between academia, industry and pop culture to advance society’s understanding of scientific phenomena and its technological implications." Now that's what I call a mission statement! 

Back to the CRADA. In Article 3 (Objectives), TSA is described as having made "discoveries" of "metamaterials and quantum physics" that offer "capability advancements for Army ground vehicles." Article D (Technical Tasks and Associated Resources) of the attached Joint Work Plan further describes TSA's proprietary technologies as "inertial mass reduction, mechanical/structural metamaterials, electromagnetic metamaterial wave guides, quantum physics, quantum communications, and beamed energy propulsion."  Whew, that's quite a laundry list of out-of-this-world (ET) technology! (And I'm not sure how anyone can claim "quantum physics" as something they own.) How did TSA get this technology? They won't say. 

That's where the rubber meets the road. Regarding metamaterials (perhaps from a crashed ET craft?), according to a September 2019 U.S. Securities and Exchange filing, TSA paid a whopping $35K to have them tested. The result? According to Vice, those small bits of allegedly alien materials turned out to be ordinary "Bismuth/Magnesium-Zinc metal alloy and a piece of aluminum." One expert called the alloy "not much more than a piece of slag from an industrial process." 

Fortunately for us taxpayers, the CRADA doesn't require the U.S. Army to pay anything to TSA for this stuff. The value to the parties lies in the fact that the U.S. Army will use its resources to test, refine, and (hopefully) use TSA's materials for military purposes, and TSA will benefit from any positive (ahem) results in terms of products that it can develop and market for commercial use. Perhaps TSA can open up new revenue sources to reduce its accumulated deficit of over $47 million as of June 30, 2019. (You can help by purchasing TSA stock; the minimum investment is $350.)

Whether or not based on ET technology, I'd love this CRADA to result in advancements that will benefit the U.S. Army - and everyone else. But I'm not holding my breath. This smacks of smoke and mirrors.


If you find this post worthwhile, please consider sharing it with your colleagues. The link to this blog is www.busklaw.blogspot.com and my website is www.busklaw.com. And my email address is busklaw@charter.net. Thanks!

Comments

Anonymous said…
Interesting article. In looking at the To the Stars website, anyone can see it’s a bogus company that dabbles in fiction more than science. I might have missed something but I’m not understanding how or why our great government would bother to contract with To the Stars to begin with.

Popular posts from this blog

The BUSKLAW June Newsletter: Forcing Business Behavior Changes Through Buried Contract Provisions: Salesforce and Camping World

As reported by  The Washington Post , business-software giant Salesforce  recently instituted a policy barring its retailer customers from using its technology to sell semi-automatic weapons, including the AR-15 used in numerous mass shootings. One such customer is  Camping World , whose Gander Outdoors division sells many "AR" and other semi-automatic rifles .  Rather than approach Camping World/Gander, a "leading" Salesforce customer, and negotiating the termination of their semi-automatic rifle sales in exchange for some benefit (such as a software discount), Salesforce was tricky. They buried a provision barring the sale of semi-automatic rifles in the acceptable-use policy  ("AUP") binding on Camping World/Gander: Salesforce wants to force Camping World/Gander to make a major change to its business model via an addition to their AUP that is irrelevant to their customer's licensed use of Salesforce software. And although sneaky, I bet tha

The BUSKLAW Halloween 2022 Post: Stephen King's Asides on Poor Writing in Fairy Tale

  Having just read  Stephen King's Fairy Tale in time for Halloween, it's appropriate to examine his asides on poor writing included in the book. (BTW, Fairy Tale is a good read with King's typical well-executed character development, plot, and a great finish to the story. But you have like the whole Grimm fairy tale genre before you read his take on it.)  Stephen King doesn't tolerate anything less than crisp prose. When the story's hero, Charlie Reade, tries to read a book about the origins of fantasy and its place in the world matrix ("what a mouthful"), he can only scan it because: It was everything I hated about what I thought of as "hoity-toity" academic writing, full of five-dollar words and tortured syntax. Maybe that's intellectual laziness on my part, but maybe not. Later on, Charlie tries to focus on a particular chapter in the "origins of fantasy" book about the story of Jack and the Beanstalk but is put off by "t

The BUSKLAW April Newsletter: A Force Majeure Clause for the New Millennium

(Author’s Note: I originally wrote this post for Y2K, but I’ve updated it using plain English.  Happy April Fool’s Day 2016!)             A standard force majeure contract clause, where "Acts of God" excuse one party from performing their obligations without that non-performance being a breach of contract, are so 20th Century. So what if fire, flood, hurricane, snowstorm, or riot excuse contractual non-performance. Those events are too mundane to contemplate! Contract lawyers desperately need a force majeure clause for the clear and present dangers of the new(er) millennium! So, as a public service to the legal profession, I’ve assumed the heavy burden of drafting a "new age" force majeure clause for my colleagues to freely use: Either party's non-performance of this agreement will be excused to the extent that it is caused by the occurrence of any of the following events or circumstances: (i) Alien abduction, alien invasion, alien cerebral possession,