Skip to main content

The BUSKLAW November Newsletter: About the U.S. Army's Extraterrestrial Technology Acquisition Contract!


This post would appear to be a Halloween prank, but it isn't. On October 10, 2019, the U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command signed a contract [or in government parlance, a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA)] with To the Stars Academy of Arts and Science, Inc. for the acquisition of the latter's ET(?) technology. The entire contract is available here, but I'll save you from the content that isn't worth your time.  

But first some history. Once there was a punk rock group called Blink 182, founded by Tom DeLonge. Tom eventually became more enthused about UFOs than rock music and decided to seriously study unexplained aerial phenomena (UAP). He claims to have formed relationships with top government officials to eventually disclose to the public what's behind UAP. In the meantime, Tom formed a public corporation, To the Stars Academy (TSA), to be a "revolutionary collaboration between academia, industry and pop culture to advance society’s understanding of scientific phenomena and its technological implications." Now that's what I call a mission statement! 

Back to the CRADA. In Article 3 (Objectives), TSA is described as having made "discoveries" of "metamaterials and quantum physics" that offer "capability advancements for Army ground vehicles." Article D (Technical Tasks and Associated Resources) of the attached Joint Work Plan further describes TSA's proprietary technologies as "inertial mass reduction, mechanical/structural metamaterials, electromagnetic metamaterial wave guides, quantum physics, quantum communications, and beamed energy propulsion."  Whew, that's quite a laundry list of out-of-this-world (ET) technology! (And I'm not sure how anyone can claim "quantum physics" as something they own.) How did TSA get this technology? They won't say. 

That's where the rubber meets the road. Regarding metamaterials (perhaps from a crashed ET craft?), according to a September 2019 U.S. Securities and Exchange filing, TSA paid a whopping $35K to have them tested. The result? According to Vice, those small bits of allegedly alien materials turned out to be ordinary "Bismuth/Magnesium-Zinc metal alloy and a piece of aluminum." One expert called the alloy "not much more than a piece of slag from an industrial process." 

Fortunately for us taxpayers, the CRADA doesn't require the U.S. Army to pay anything to TSA for this stuff. The value to the parties lies in the fact that the U.S. Army will use its resources to test, refine, and (hopefully) use TSA's materials for military purposes, and TSA will benefit from any positive (ahem) results in terms of products that it can develop and market for commercial use. Perhaps TSA can open up new revenue sources to reduce its accumulated deficit of over $47 million as of June 30, 2019. (You can help by purchasing TSA stock; the minimum investment is $350.)

Whether or not based on ET technology, I'd love this CRADA to result in advancements that will benefit the U.S. Army - and everyone else. But I'm not holding my breath. This smacks of smoke and mirrors.


If you find this post worthwhile, please consider sharing it with your colleagues. The link to this blog is www.busklaw.blogspot.com and my website is www.busklaw.com. And my email address is busklaw@charter.net. Thanks!

Comments

Anonymous said…
Interesting article. In looking at the To the Stars website, anyone can see it’s a bogus company that dabbles in fiction more than science. I might have missed something but I’m not understanding how or why our great government would bother to contract with To the Stars to begin with.

Popular posts from this blog

The BUSKLAW May Newsletter: The Foolhardy Practice of Using Faux Terms of Art in Your Contracts

  Most lawyers draft contracts. That's what lawyers do. And they use perceived terms of art ("TOAs") because they want to be paragons of contract-drafting precision. But here is where the canker gnaws:  the words that lawyers insert in their contracts as TOAs are actually not, potentially causing problems in clarity and interpretation. And as I've said time and again, these problems lead to disputes, and disputes lead to litigation, which is always time-consuming and expensive for the parties involved.  Let's first define TOAs in the legal context. According to Professor Bryan Garner in his Dictionary of Legal Usage , TOAs have specific, precise meanings that are "locked tight" and based on legal precedent. But then there are the faux TOAs, "whose meanings are often unhinged." Expert contract drafters, Garner says, know that clear, simple drafting is less subject to misinterpretation than using TOAs that are nothing more than "mere jargon....

The BUSKLAW 2021 Year in Review - Brit English Sums It Up!

  I'm at a loss to describe 2021 using American English, sorry. AmE has grown tiresome. Don't believe me? Just turn on your local TV news and listen for how many times the news people use "prior" instead of "before" and pepper their speech with "as well," frequently tacking it on after using "also" in the same sentence, as in "It will also rain tomorrow as well." How can all be WELL when every other sentence ends with AS WELL? Warning: don't play a drinking game to count the number of  AS WELLs or you'll be pished (as they say in Scotland) in 10 minutes. Which reminds me of why we should be thankful for Brit English to describe 2021: it was another year that we good guys got knackered .   Consider: Covid continues unabated - now improved with variants (get your booster, wear a mask)! The peaceful transition of the U.S. government after the 2020 presidential election almost didn't happen (can you say "insurrectio...

The BUSKLAW Halloween 2022 Post: Stephen King's Asides on Poor Writing in Fairy Tale

  Having just read  Stephen King's Fairy Tale in time for Halloween, it's appropriate to examine his asides on poor writing included in the book. (BTW, Fairy Tale is a good read with King's typical well-executed character development, plot, and a great finish to the story. But you have like the whole Grimm fairy tale genre before you read his take on it.)  Stephen King doesn't tolerate anything less than crisp prose. When the story's hero, Charlie Reade, tries to read a book about the origins of fantasy and its place in the world matrix ("what a mouthful"), he can only scan it because: It was everything I hated about what I thought of as "hoity-toity" academic writing, full of five-dollar words and tortured syntax. Maybe that's intellectual laziness on my part, but maybe not. Later on, Charlie tries to focus on a particular chapter in the "origins of fantasy" book about the story of Jack and the Beanstalk but is put off by "t...