Skip to main content

The BUSKLAW February Newsletter: Are Your "Terms and Conditions" Sticky?


Please indulge me. Pretend that these flies are your customers and suppliers. Further pretend that this flypaper is your standard contract that you have posted on your website, no doubt to save time - and trees. 

Your standard contract is essential to protecting your company, right? It probably contains an indemnity, warranty or warranty disclaimer, a liability limitation, a remote damages exclusion, and a governing law provision. But what it doesn't contain is the business terms of your deals. Those are neatly packaged in a one-page document that you can quickly create and email to your suppliers (as a PO) or to your customers (as a sales acknowledgment). Ah, you are amazed by this beautiful simplicity of managing your customers and suppliers! You are enthralled by this well-oiled business process! 

Not so fast. Are the flies really stuck to the flypaper? Are you certain that your standard contract is legally binding on your customers and suppliers? 

Here's the fly in the ointment. Your customers and suppliers likely have their own contracts that they want to control the deal instead of your contracts. And their terms and conditions will probably conflict with yours - to your detriment if a dispute ever arises. 

Now you may say, "the likelihood of a big dispute with our customers and suppliers is small." If you extend that logic, then feel free to cancel your company's commercial general liability insurance because the odds are you'll never need it. Even one commercial dispute can adversely impact your company's bottom line, hurt your reputation, and cause other mischiefs in the workplace. No, you need to take steps to make sure (to the extent you can) that your contract will prevail over any other contract presented by your customer or supplier. What steps should you take to win this battle of the forms?

First, don't rely on non-negotiated form contracts for larger deals where your company has substantial liability exposure if things go awry. You need to specially negotiate these deals - both the legal and business terms - with competent legal counsel working closely with your senior management team. The result should be a comprehensive, mutually signed and dated contract rather than hyperlinks to your website agreement. 

Second, if you must rely on website-posted agreements, consider including an "I ACCEPT" button at the end of each form and logging the date and time of your customer's or supplier's acceptance that will be permanently retained in a secure, backed-up database. And implement a business rule that you don't issue a PO or sales acknowledgment unless your agreements are expressly accepted. 

Third, if you don't want to log your customer's or supplier's acceptance, make sure that your business paper (those one-page POs or sales acknowledgments that contain business provisions) properly incorporate the legal stuff posted on your website. Don't say something like: "See additional terms and conditions posted at [URL]." Rather, say "Additional terms and conditions posted at [URL] are incorporated by reference as if they were entirely stated herein." And make this statement stand out by using bold text and a larger font than the surrounding text. (But don't put the statement in CAPS.) 

Fourth, make sure that your website-posted contracts contain the correct language to knock out your supplier's or customer's conflicting legal terms. This language can take several forms, and you'll excuse me if I don't print a sample here for fear that you will use it incorrectly. (Call me instead.)

Losing the battle of the forms can be costly as discussed in a previous post. Why not do what you can to make your agreements prevail? To make 'em stick? 
  ____________________________________

If you find this post worthwhile, please consider sharing it with your colleagues. The link to this blog is www.busklaw.blogspot.com and my website is www.busklaw.com. And my email address is busklaw@charter.net. Thanks! 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The BUSKLAW June Newsletter: Forcing Business Behavior Changes Through Buried Contract Provisions: Salesforce and Camping World

As reported by  The Washington Post , business-software giant Salesforce  recently instituted a policy barring its retailer customers from using its technology to sell semi-automatic weapons, including the AR-15 used in numerous mass shootings. One such customer is  Camping World , whose Gander Outdoors division sells many "AR" and other semi-automatic rifles .  Rather than approach Camping World/Gander, a "leading" Salesforce customer, and negotiating the termination of their semi-automatic rifle sales in exchange for some benefit (such as a software discount), Salesforce was tricky. They buried a provision barring the sale of semi-automatic rifles in the acceptable-use policy  ("AUP") binding on Camping World/Gander: Salesforce wants to force Camping World/Gander to make a major change to its business model via an addition to their AUP that is irrelevant to their customer's licensed use of Salesforce software. And although sneaky, I bet tha

The BUSKLAW Halloween 2022 Post: Stephen King's Asides on Poor Writing in Fairy Tale

  Having just read  Stephen King's Fairy Tale in time for Halloween, it's appropriate to examine his asides on poor writing included in the book. (BTW, Fairy Tale is a good read with King's typical well-executed character development, plot, and a great finish to the story. But you have like the whole Grimm fairy tale genre before you read his take on it.)  Stephen King doesn't tolerate anything less than crisp prose. When the story's hero, Charlie Reade, tries to read a book about the origins of fantasy and its place in the world matrix ("what a mouthful"), he can only scan it because: It was everything I hated about what I thought of as "hoity-toity" academic writing, full of five-dollar words and tortured syntax. Maybe that's intellectual laziness on my part, but maybe not. Later on, Charlie tries to focus on a particular chapter in the "origins of fantasy" book about the story of Jack and the Beanstalk but is put off by "t

The BUSKLAW April Newsletter: A Force Majeure Clause for the New Millennium

(Author’s Note: I originally wrote this post for Y2K, but I’ve updated it using plain English.  Happy April Fool’s Day 2016!)             A standard force majeure contract clause, where "Acts of God" excuse one party from performing their obligations without that non-performance being a breach of contract, are so 20th Century. So what if fire, flood, hurricane, snowstorm, or riot excuse contractual non-performance. Those events are too mundane to contemplate! Contract lawyers desperately need a force majeure clause for the clear and present dangers of the new(er) millennium! So, as a public service to the legal profession, I’ve assumed the heavy burden of drafting a "new age" force majeure clause for my colleagues to freely use: Either party's non-performance of this agreement will be excused to the extent that it is caused by the occurrence of any of the following events or circumstances: (i) Alien abduction, alien invasion, alien cerebral possession,