Skip to main content

The BUSKLAW May Newsletter: Oh, Fudge! Famous Interior Designer Sues Mackinac Island's Famous Grand Hotel




As reported by MLive and ABC 12 News, famous interior designer Carleton Varney has sued the new owners of Mackinac Island's famous Grand Hotel. (Mackinac Island is also famous for its fudge, a guilty pleasure.)

You would expect the lawsuit to be for breach of contract, i.e., the Grand Hotel's owners failed to pay Mr. Varney for his interior design services rendered. His relationship with the Hotel goes back about 43 years, and the Hotel was recently sold by its long-time family owners, the Mussers, to an international investment firm, KSL Capital Partners.   

But there will be no pondering of any design contract's terms, no assessment of facts that may or may not constitute breach of contract, no rumination over contractual issues. Because Varney's lawsuit is for damages arising from first, age discrimination, and second, conversion of his personal property. Although Varney's Complaint isn't available online (and a trip to the Washtenaw County Circuit Court Clerk for a copy is impractical), let's discuss what facts we do know - and the elements of both legal theories - with the goal of providing an armchair assessment of his case. 

Mr. Varney is 83 years old, and while federal and state laws prohibit age discrimination, they do so only in the context of an employment relationship, so the Grand Hotel must have discharged Varney as an employee on the basis of his age. But there's no evidence (and apparently no allegation) that Varney was ever employed by the Grand Hotel. Assuming that Varney was an independent contractor with the Hotel (the most likely scenario), the Hotel could refuse to do business with him for any reason. That refusal could well be a breach of contract, but it isn't age (or any other) discrimination prohibited by law, even if the Hotel wanted a younger interior designer (which apparently is the case). So Varney's age discrimination claim appears fanciful.   

The personal property conversion claim is more interesting and probably fact-intensive. Varney alleges that over the years, he placed signed irreplaceable presidential and celebrity photos and other memorabilia (such as a framed dress that once belonged to actress Joan Crawford) in many of the Hotel's suites to give them his "personal touch." But when the Hotel was sold to KSL, this property wasn't returned to him.

Michigan recognizes both common law and statutory conversion. The Michigan Supreme Court has recognized common law conversion as “any act of dominion wrongfully exerted over another’s personal property in denial of, or consistent with his (or her) rights therein.” If Varney can prove common-law conversion, he may recover the value of the property converted, plus statutory interest. 

But there's also a Michigan statute on conversion, MCL § 600.2919a. As discussed in this 2014 Michigan Bar Journal article, a plaintiff prevailing on a statutory conversion claim may recover treble damages (plus legal fees and court costs) if the person buying the converted property either knew that the property was converted or that the property was converted to the buyer's "own use." Based on rules of statutory interpretation, Defendant KSL can hardly maintain that Varney's property wasn't converted to their own use. So whether there was conversion depends on whether Varney ever intended to convey these photos and memorabilia to the Hotel or were they just "on loan." You would look for a bill of sale, purchase agreement, or some other tangible evidence proving the parties' intent. However, since these items appear to have been placed in the Hotel's suites a long time ago, this may be a daunting task. It may well come down to Varney's recollection against the recollection of Musser family members, assuming that any are left to testify about the circumstances surrounding Varney's placement of the items. And then a jury deciding who is more credible. 

This case will be an interesting one to watch if it goes to trial. But since famous reputations are at stake, I'm betting on an out-of-court settlement sooner rather than later.
____________________________________

If you find this post worthwhile, please consider sharing it with your colleagues. The link to this blog is www.busklaw.blogspot.com and my website is www.busklaw.com. And my email address is busklaw@charter.net. Thanks!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The BUSKLAW June Newsletter: Forcing Business Behavior Changes Through Buried Contract Provisions: Salesforce and Camping World

As reported by  The Washington Post , business-software giant Salesforce  recently instituted a policy barring its retailer customers from using its technology to sell semi-automatic weapons, including the AR-15 used in numerous mass shootings. One such customer is  Camping World , whose Gander Outdoors division sells many "AR" and other semi-automatic rifles .  Rather than approach Camping World/Gander, a "leading" Salesforce customer, and negotiating the termination of their semi-automatic rifle sales in exchange for some benefit (such as a software discount), Salesforce was tricky. They buried a provision barring the sale of semi-automatic rifles in the acceptable-use policy  ("AUP") binding on Camping World/Gander: Salesforce wants to force Camping World/Gander to make a major change to its business model via an addition to their AUP that is irrelevant to their customer's licensed use of Salesforce software. And although sneaky, I bet tha

The BUSKLAW Halloween 2022 Post: Stephen King's Asides on Poor Writing in Fairy Tale

  Having just read  Stephen King's Fairy Tale in time for Halloween, it's appropriate to examine his asides on poor writing included in the book. (BTW, Fairy Tale is a good read with King's typical well-executed character development, plot, and a great finish to the story. But you have like the whole Grimm fairy tale genre before you read his take on it.)  Stephen King doesn't tolerate anything less than crisp prose. When the story's hero, Charlie Reade, tries to read a book about the origins of fantasy and its place in the world matrix ("what a mouthful"), he can only scan it because: It was everything I hated about what I thought of as "hoity-toity" academic writing, full of five-dollar words and tortured syntax. Maybe that's intellectual laziness on my part, but maybe not. Later on, Charlie tries to focus on a particular chapter in the "origins of fantasy" book about the story of Jack and the Beanstalk but is put off by "t

The BUSKLAW April Newsletter: A Force Majeure Clause for the New Millennium

(Author’s Note: I originally wrote this post for Y2K, but I’ve updated it using plain English.  Happy April Fool’s Day 2016!)             A standard force majeure contract clause, where "Acts of God" excuse one party from performing their obligations without that non-performance being a breach of contract, are so 20th Century. So what if fire, flood, hurricane, snowstorm, or riot excuse contractual non-performance. Those events are too mundane to contemplate! Contract lawyers desperately need a force majeure clause for the clear and present dangers of the new(er) millennium! So, as a public service to the legal profession, I’ve assumed the heavy burden of drafting a "new age" force majeure clause for my colleagues to freely use: Either party's non-performance of this agreement will be excused to the extent that it is caused by the occurrence of any of the following events or circumstances: (i) Alien abduction, alien invasion, alien cerebral possession,