Skip to main content

The BUSKLAW June Newsletter: Failing Business Practices and Your Contracts



I've been practicing corporate law for 40 years. And I've been privileged to work with many talented business people. One of the most talented was the late Fred Meijer, who always wanted his legal team to not only be good lawyers but also to protect the company by searching out business gaps - and filling them. So, partnering with my Meijer business clients, that's what I did, and that's what I'm still doing for other companies. 

But some companies suffer from dysfunctional contracting. In my experience, the following failed business practices are common in the business world: 

1.    Poor Contract Management and Retention. Does your company have a single point of contact for your contracts? In smaller firms, this could be your CFO. This person should double as your records retention officer who should be charged with the maintenance and enforcement of a corporate records retention manual. Why do you need a records retention manual? Because without it some of your departments will keep their records too long and others won't keep them long enough. And when you are sued and asked to produce certain corporate records as part of the discovery process, you won't be able to produce them or can't find them. Good luck telling this to the court in resisting opposing counsel's request for sanctions because of your failure to produce for no good reason. 

2.    Your Website Contracts Aren't Enforceable. In this day and age, everything is on the web, and many companies post their standard corporate contracts on their websites for their suppliers and customers. Congrats, you're saving paper! But are your website contracts legally enforceable? I wrote about this topic here, and it deserves another read. You can have the best-drafted contracts in the world, but they are meaningless if not binding on the other party. 

3.    You Don't Understand Your Contracts. If you are a corporate officer, you have fiduciary duties to your company. These non-delegable obligations include the need to actually understand your contracts. Here are some of the key provisions in your contracts that you should, with the help of your lawyer, grasp:
  • indemnity
  • confidentiality
  • intellectual property ownership
  • governing law
  • dispute resolution
  • insurance
  • liability limitation
  • waiver of certain damages
Regarding these provisions as simply "legal stuff that my lawyer understands and I don't need to" is foolish, because how they operate will impact your bottom line - for good or for ill. 

4. Your Contracts Suck (probably that's why you don't understand them). Excuse the vulgarity here, but it's a tribute to the late, great singer and humanitarian Harry Chapin, whose bandmates used the term to describe the different endings that Harry wrote to his 30,000 Pounds of Bananas song. (Undaunted by Michigan winters, Harry would often appear in snowy Grand Rapids circa 1978 for a concert or two.) So why do your contracts suck? Go here for the answer. Maybe you think that your contracts are the best thing since sliced bread. Really? A quick test is to bring up the Word versions on your screen and search for: "and/or," "notwithstanding," "whereas," "execute," or "witnesseth." If any of these terms appear, your contracts, quite simply, suck. And sucky contracts are often litigated. 

5.    You Don't Have Proper Employee Agreements. Gone are the days when your management employees stayed with you indefinitely. What they learn working for you (and the intellectual property that they create) could well benefit your competitor. To prevent that you must have appropriate and enforceable agreements with your employees that give you ownership of all intellectual property that they create while working for you, requires them to keep your business information confidential, and prevents them from competing with you after they leave your firm.

These failed business practices are only exacerbated by the CV-19 pandemic, when management employees responsible for contracting practices are dispersed and likely occupied with thinking how to mitigate the pandemic's impact on day-to-day business operations. Nevertheless, you're betting your company's financial stability (and your own career) if you decide to do nothing to remedy these (entirely fixable) conditions.

If you do need fixes for these failed business practices, I'd be pleased to help.  
____________________________________

If you find this post worthwhile, please consider sharing it with your colleagues. The link to this blog is www.busklaw.blogspot.com and my website is www.busklaw.com. And my email address is busklaw@charter.net. Thanks!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The BUSKLAW 2021 Year in Review - Brit English Sums It Up!

  I'm at a loss to describe 2021 using American English, sorry. AmE has grown tiresome. Don't believe me? Just turn on your local TV news and listen for how many times the news people use "prior" instead of "before" and pepper their speech with "as well," frequently tacking it on after using "also" in the same sentence, as in "It will also rain tomorrow as well." How can all be WELL when every other sentence ends with AS WELL? Warning: don't play a drinking game to count the number of  AS WELLs or you'll be pished (as they say in Scotland) in 10 minutes. Which reminds me of why we should be thankful for Brit English to describe 2021: it was another year that we good guys got knackered .   Consider: Covid continues unabated - now improved with variants (get your booster, wear a mask)! The peaceful transition of the U.S. government after the 2020 presidential election almost didn't happen (can you say "insurrectio...

The BUSKLAW Halloween 2022 Post: Stephen King's Asides on Poor Writing in Fairy Tale

  Having just read  Stephen King's Fairy Tale in time for Halloween, it's appropriate to examine his asides on poor writing included in the book. (BTW, Fairy Tale is a good read with King's typical well-executed character development, plot, and a great finish to the story. But you have like the whole Grimm fairy tale genre before you read his take on it.)  Stephen King doesn't tolerate anything less than crisp prose. When the story's hero, Charlie Reade, tries to read a book about the origins of fantasy and its place in the world matrix ("what a mouthful"), he can only scan it because: It was everything I hated about what I thought of as "hoity-toity" academic writing, full of five-dollar words and tortured syntax. Maybe that's intellectual laziness on my part, but maybe not. Later on, Charlie tries to focus on a particular chapter in the "origins of fantasy" book about the story of Jack and the Beanstalk but is put off by "t...

The BUSKLAW May Newsletter: The Foolhardy Practice of Using Faux Terms of Art in Your Contracts

  Most lawyers draft contracts. That's what lawyers do. And they use perceived terms of art ("TOAs") because they want to be paragons of contract-drafting precision. But here is where the canker gnaws:  the words that lawyers insert in their contracts as TOAs are actually not, potentially causing problems in clarity and interpretation. And as I've said time and again, these problems lead to disputes, and disputes lead to litigation, which is always time-consuming and expensive for the parties involved.  Let's first define TOAs in the legal context. According to Professor Bryan Garner in his Dictionary of Legal Usage , TOAs have specific, precise meanings that are "locked tight" and based on legal precedent. But then there are the faux TOAs, "whose meanings are often unhinged." Expert contract drafters, Garner says, know that clear, simple drafting is less subject to misinterpretation than using TOAs that are nothing more than "mere jargon....