Skip to main content

The BUSKLAW 2020 Year in Review: Can We Let It Go?


 Before SNL's Weekend Update, before Colbert, before YouTube and its ubiquitous political satire, there was That Was the Week that Was, a/k/a TW3. Each week from 1963 to 1965 sexy folksinger Nancy Ames would belt out the TV show's theme song that began "That was the week that was, it's over, let it go..." 

Which is how I feel about 2020. The problem is that many of us can't let 2020 go. Until the vaccine is rolled out, you can still get Covid and suffer from lingering side effects. Like me, you may have lost a loved one in 2020 and are mourning their loss - in relative isolation. Or perhaps you lost your job because of Covid and are trying to figure out how to pay your bills, as the Washington politicians bring out their assorted axes to grind in the last days of the Trump administration. And the gap between the very rich and everyone else is growing.

Be that as it may, we persevere. And so we move from deep thoughts about 2020 to the more navigable waters of what we talked about in 2020:

> In February, we discussed how to make your external contracts posted on your website enforceable - or "sticky." In my experience, businesses discount the importance of that process, so please re-read this post if you use your company website as the vehicle to have your customers or suppliers find out about (and supposedly agree to) your purchase order or other terms and conditions.

> In March, we examined the challenge to the "goats-on-a-roof" trademark, and why it failed, much to the delight of the owner and licensees of that very unique mark. 

> In April, we explained why it's better not to litigate over a force majeure clause, settle your contract dispute without lawyers, and donate the money that you would have paid your lawyer to a worthy charity working to mitigate the pandemic's impact. 

> In May, we discussed a famous interior decorator's lawsuit against the Mackinac Hotel over the ownership of memorabilia placed in the rooms and whether that placement may constitute the tort of conversion under Michigan law.

> In June, we listed the common ways that business contracts are mismanaged and ways to correct that failure. This post is especially important to smaller companies that lack a legal department or contract manager to keep their contracts in good order.

> In August, we learned the lessons from the court's rejection of the Trump family non-disclosure agreement and how to avoid these pitfalls in your own NDAs. 

> In September, we examined the Kent County business court's handling of a lawsuit that alleged some rather retro causes of action for remedies concerning an "unbearable" Labradoodle.  

> In October, we discovered what happens when the person in charge of managing your contracts performs like a codfish.

> In November, we learned that in Michigan, employment-related restrictive covenants such as non-competition and non-solicitation clauses have teeth. 

> In December, I highlighted my appearance on Law Insider's "Contract Teardown" show, hosted by Mike Whelan, where I analyzed the peculiar qualities of the Icon A5's ("the jet ski with wings") purchase and operating agreements. 

Hopefully, you found these posts informative and entertaining. In 2021, we'll strive for more of the same as we try to move on from 2020.

__________________________________

If you find this post worthwhile, please consider sharing it with your colleagues. The link to this blog is www.busklaw.blogspot.com and my website is www.busklaw.com. And my email address is busklaw@charter.net. Thanks! 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The BUSKLAW Halloween 2022 Post: Stephen King's Asides on Poor Writing in Fairy Tale

  Having just read  Stephen King's Fairy Tale in time for Halloween, it's appropriate to examine his asides on poor writing included in the book. (BTW, Fairy Tale is a good read with King's typical well-executed character development, plot, and a great finish to the story. But you have like the whole Grimm fairy tale genre before you read his take on it.)  Stephen King doesn't tolerate anything less than crisp prose. When the story's hero, Charlie Reade, tries to read a book about the origins of fantasy and its place in the world matrix ("what a mouthful"), he can only scan it because: It was everything I hated about what I thought of as "hoity-toity" academic writing, full of five-dollar words and tortured syntax. Maybe that's intellectual laziness on my part, but maybe not. Later on, Charlie tries to focus on a particular chapter in the "origins of fantasy" book about the story of Jack and the Beanstalk but is put off by "t...

The BUSKLAW May Newsletter: The Foolhardy Practice of Using Faux Terms of Art in Your Contracts

  Most lawyers draft contracts. That's what lawyers do. And they use perceived terms of art ("TOAs") because they want to be paragons of contract-drafting precision. But here is where the canker gnaws:  the words that lawyers insert in their contracts as TOAs are actually not, potentially causing problems in clarity and interpretation. And as I've said time and again, these problems lead to disputes, and disputes lead to litigation, which is always time-consuming and expensive for the parties involved.  Let's first define TOAs in the legal context. According to Professor Bryan Garner in his Dictionary of Legal Usage , TOAs have specific, precise meanings that are "locked tight" and based on legal precedent. But then there are the faux TOAs, "whose meanings are often unhinged." Expert contract drafters, Garner says, know that clear, simple drafting is less subject to misinterpretation than using TOAs that are nothing more than "mere jargon....

The BUSKLAW May Newsletter: Another Trump NDA Bites the Dust!

  In my August 2020 newsletter, we discussed lessons from the New York Supreme Court's rejection of the Trump family NDA. Drafting lesson #1 is the need to specifically describe the information covered by the NDA rather than vague references.  Unfortunately for Trump, this lesson wasn't learned, as evidenced by a recent New York U.S. District Court decision in the case of  J essica Denson v Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.   Plaintiff Denson was employed as a national phone bank administrator for the 2016 Trump campaign. Before she was hired, she signed the standard Trump employment contract containing broad non-disclosure and non-disparagement provisions. Confidential Information was defined as: ...all information (whether or not embodied in any media) of a private, proprietary or confidential nature or that Mr. Trump insists remain private or confidential, including, but not limited to, any information with respect to the personal life, political affairs, and/o...